Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Snowflake COF-R02 Exam - Topic 1 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for Snowflake's COF-R02 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 1
[All COF-R02 Questions]

Which of the following is an example of an operation that can be completed without requiring compute, assuming no queries have been executed previously?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Bette at Jan 26, 2024, 09:11 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium COF-R02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kenia
4 months ago
C is the best choice here, no doubt!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavina
5 months ago
I think D is definitely out of the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julie
5 months ago
Wait, how can C be done without compute? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
5 months ago
Totally agree, C seems like the only one that fits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
5 months ago
A and B need compute, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
6 months ago
I recall that MIN and AVG often require a full scan of the data, so maybe they aren't the right choices here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D because it seems like it might not need prior computation, but I’m not entirely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
6 months ago
I remember practicing similar questions, and I feel like aggregate functions like SUM or AVG usually require some computation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
6 months ago
I think the question is about operations that can be done without needing to compute anything first. I’m not sure if any of these options fit that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards B. Calculating the average of a column seems like it could be done without any prior queries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Can we assume the table has already been loaded into memory?
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
6 months ago
Option C looks good to me - finding the minimum value in a column should be doable without any previous queries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
6 months ago
I think the answer is A. Calculating the sum of a column doesn't require any prior queries to be executed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between the reinforcement and punishment options. Wouldn't using a high-magnitude punishment every time the behavior occurs also work to reduce the frequency? Or is the differential reinforcement approach better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
6 months ago
Hmm, this one seems a bit tricky. I'll need to think through the different backup scenarios and what could be causing the Convert to virtual option to be greyed out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hailey
11 months ago
I'll go with C as well. Retrieving the minimum value seems like the most straightforward operation that wouldn't require too much compute power.
upvoted 0 times
Frederica
10 months ago
C) SELECT MIN(ORDER_AMT) FROM SALES;
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
10 months ago
B) SELECT AVG(ORDER_QTY) FROM SALES;
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherrell
10 months ago
A) SELECT SUM (ORDER_AMT) FROM SALES;
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dean
11 months ago
Ha! 'Assuming no queries have been executed previously?' What kind of trick question is this? I bet the answer is 'None of the above' since any SQL query is going to require compute power.
upvoted 0 times
Chu
10 months ago
Exactly, it's a tricky question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathan
10 months ago
True, any SQL query will require compute power.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
10 months ago
None of the above
upvoted 0 times
...
Melinda
10 months ago
D) SELECT ORDER_AMT * ORDER_QTY FROM SALES;
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
10 months ago
C) SELECT MIN(ORDER_AMT) FROM SALES;
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
10 months ago
B) SELECT AVG(ORDER_QTY) FROM SALES;
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
11 months ago
A) SELECT SUM (ORDER_AMT) FROM SALES;
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bulah
11 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. Aren't all of these operations going to require some level of computation? Even just fetching the data seems like it would involve compute resources.
upvoted 0 times
Dahlia
11 months ago
C) SELECT MIN(ORDER_AMT) FROM SALES;
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
11 months ago
B) SELECT AVG(ORDER_QTY) FROM SALES;
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacey
11 months ago
A) SELECT SUM (ORDER_AMT) FROM SALES;
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Renea
12 months ago
But for MIN function, it doesn't require any computation, so it can be completed without queries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
12 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A) SELECT SUM (ORDER_AMT) FROM SALES.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
1 year ago
I think the answer is C) SELECT MIN(ORDER_AMT) FROM SALES.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
1 year ago
But wouldn't calculating the minimum value also require computation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is C. Selecting the minimum order amount from the sales table doesn't require compute, as it's just retrieving the lowest value.
upvoted 0 times
Tran
10 months ago
D) SELECT ORDER_AMT * ORDER_QTY FROM SALES;
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
11 months ago
C) SELECT MIN(ORDER_AMT) FROM SALES;
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
11 months ago
B) SELECT AVG(ORDER_QTY) FROM SALES;
upvoted 0 times
...
Dolores
11 months ago
A) SELECT SUM (ORDER_AMT) FROM SALES;
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daron
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) SELECT MIN(ORDER_AMT) FROM SALES.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) SELECT SUM (ORDER_AMT) FROM SALES.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel