New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Snowflake ARA-R01 Exam - Topic 2 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Snowflake's ARA-R01 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 2
[All ARA-R01 Questions]

A company is following the Data Mesh principles, including domain separation, and chose one Snowflake account for its data platform.

An Architect created two data domains to produce two data products. The Architect needs a third data domain that will use both of the data products to create an aggregate data product. The read access to the data products will be granted through a separate role.

Based on the Data Mesh principles, how should the third domain be configured to create the aggregate product if it has been granted the two read roles?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

In the scenario described, where a third data domain needs access to two existing data products in a Snowflake account structured according to Data Mesh principles, the best approach is to utilize Snowflake's Data Exchange functionality. Option D is correct as it facilitates the sharing and governance of data across different domains efficiently and securely. Data Exchange allows domains to publish and subscribe to live data products, enabling real-time data collaboration and access management in a governed manner. This approach is in line with Data Mesh principles, which advocate for decentralized data ownership and architecture, enhancing agility and scalability across the organization. Reference:

Snowflake Documentation on Data Exchange

Articles on Data Mesh Principles in Data Management


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Geoffrey
3 months ago
Wait, can they really use the Data Exchange for this?
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
3 months ago
Secondary roles could work, but not sure if it's the most efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
3 months ago
Isn't requesting a sysadmin role a bit risky?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
4 months ago
I disagree, I think a hierarchy would complicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
4 months ago
Option D sounds like the best approach for sharing data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mable
4 months ago
I think requesting a sysadmin role seems too extreme for just aggregating data products. There must be a better way to handle access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
4 months ago
I have a vague recollection of hierarchy in roles, but I can't quite recall how it applies to data domains.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
4 months ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced about data sharing. I think using the Data Exchange could be a good option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Millie
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how roles work in Snowflake, but I'm not sure if secondary roles are the best approach for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alise
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B - creating a hierarchy between the two read roles. That seems like it would allow the third domain to inherit the necessary permissions without having to manage multiple roles. But I'll double-check the other options just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
5 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. The third domain needs to access the two data products, so it will likely need some kind of read access. The question is asking about the best way to configure that, based on Data Mesh principles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marnie
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the mention of "Data Mesh principles" - I'm not too familiar with that concept. I'll need to review the details to make sure I understand the context before attempting to answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about Snowflake roles and permissions. I think the key is understanding how to properly configure the third domain to access the two data products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the information in the exhibit to determine the best delivery model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
5 months ago
Hmm, this one seems straightforward. I'll carefully read through the options and think about the key responsibilities of each role.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a complex scenario. I think the key will be finding a way to balance the need for transparency and coordination with the reality of shifting priorities. I'll have to weigh the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully break down the information and think through the process instances to figure out the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
2 years ago
I chose C, but now I'm not so sure. Asking for a technical ETL user with sysadmin role seemed overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
2 years ago
I think D makes sense more. Sharing data using Data Exchange is in line with data mesh principles, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
2 years ago
Interesting, I thought B could work, creating a hierarchy between the two read roles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
2 years ago
I put D, requesting that the two data domains share data using the Data Exchange.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
2 years ago
Yeah, definitely threw me off. What did you answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
2 years ago
Did anyone find that data mesh question confusing?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel