Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Snowflake ARA-C01 Exam - Topic 4 Question 14 Discussion

A company has a table with that has corrupted data, named Data. The company wants to recover the data as it was 5 minutes ago using cloning and Time Travel.What command will accomplish this?
C) CREATE TABLE Recover_Data CLONE Data AT(OFFSET => -60*5);
A) CREATE CLONE TABLE Recover_Data FROM Data AT(OFFSET => -60*5);
B) CREATE CLONE Recover_Data FROM Data AT(OFFSET => -60*5);
D) CREATE TABLE Recover Data CLONE Data AT(TIME => -60*5);

Snowflake ARA-C01 Exam - Topic 4 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for Snowflake's ARA-C01 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 4
[All ARA-C01 Questions]

A company has a table with that has corrupted data, named Dat

a. The company wants to recover the data as it was 5 minutes ago using cloning and Time Travel.

What command will accomplish this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Twana at Oct 07, 2023, 10:25 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ARA-C01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Carri
8 months ago
Totally agree with Loreta, A is definitely it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
8 months ago
Wait, can we really recover data like that? Sounds too easy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
8 months ago
C looks good too, but I’m not sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
8 months ago
I think B is the right choice, not A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
8 months ago
Option A is the correct command!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rusty
9 months ago
I vaguely recall that the command should start with CREATE CLONE, but I can't remember if it’s TABLE or just CLONE.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the difference between using OFFSET and TIME in the commands. I hope I picked the right one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
9 months ago
I think option A and B look identical, but I feel like one of them has to be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylou
9 months ago
I remember we practiced a similar question about cloning tables, but I’m not sure if the syntax is exactly the same here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
9 months ago
Ah, I see what's going on here. The key is that we need to create a new "Recover_Data" table, not just clone the existing "Data" table. So option C looks like the winner to me. The time offset of -60*5 is the right way to go back 5 minutes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
9 months ago
This is a tricky one! I'm not super familiar with the specific syntax for cloning and time travel in databases. I'm going to rule out options A and B since they don't mention the "TIME" parameter. I think I'll go with option D, but I'm not totally confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaquana
9 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. We need to recover the data as it was 5 minutes ago, so we're looking for a time travel function. Option D mentions "TIME => -60*5", which seems to be the right approach. I'll go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. Is the "Recover_Data" table supposed to be a new table, or are we just cloning the existing "Data" table? I'm leaning towards option C, but I'm not 100% sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
9 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about cloning and time travel in a database. I think option B is the correct answer, as it directly creates a clone of the Data table at the specified time offset.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit stumped on this one. I know there are a few different files involved in Sendmail configuration, but I can't recall which one specifically allows users to redirect their mail. I'll have to review the material and see if I can figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
10 months ago
I feel like none of these options fully address the issue, especially since the core logic is so convoluted. Maybe a complete redesign is needed?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel