New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Snowflake ARA-C01 Exam - Topic 2 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for Snowflake's ARA-C01 exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 2
[All ARA-C01 Questions]

A company has built a data pipeline using Snowpipe to ingest files from an Amazon S3 bucket. Snowpipe is configured to load data into staging database tables. Then a task runs to load the data from the staging database tables into the reporting database tables.

The company is satisfied with the availability of the data in the reporting database tables, but the reporting tables are not pruning effectively. Currently, a size 4X-Large virtual warehouse is being used to query all of the tables in the reporting database.

What step can be taken to improve the pruning of the reporting tables?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Effective pruning in Snowflake relies on the organization of data within micro-partitions. By using an ORDER BY clause with clustering keys when loading data into the reporting tables, Snowflake can better organize the data within micro-partitions. This organization allows Snowflake to skip over irrelevant micro-partitions during a query, thus improving query performance and reducing the amount of data scanned12.


* Snowflake Documentation on micro-partitions and data clustering2

* Community article on recognizing unsatisfactory pruning and improving it1

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Tamra
3 months ago
Wait, larger files for Snowpipe? That sounds counterintuitive!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenny
3 months ago
Increasing the warehouse size doesn't really solve the pruning issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rana
3 months ago
Not sure about eliminating Snowpipe, seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
4 months ago
Agree, clustering is key for performance!
upvoted 0 times
...
Phung
4 months ago
I think using an ORDER BY command can really help with pruning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
4 months ago
I vaguely recall that Snowpipe is efficient for ingestion, but maybe it's not the best for pruning. I'm leaning towards option C for the ORDER BY command.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
4 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to optimize data loading. I wonder if creating larger files could help, like in option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like increasing the warehouse size won't really solve the pruning issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
5 months ago
I remember discussing how clustering can help with pruning, so I think option C might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
5 months ago
The way I see it, the best approach would be to create larger files for Snowpipe to ingest and ensure the staging frequency doesn't exceed 1 minute, as suggested in option D. That could help improve the overall efficiency of the data pipeline and potentially address the pruning issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C, which is to use an ORDER BY command to load the reporting tables. That could help with the pruning by ensuring the data is organized in a way that makes it easier to remove old or unnecessary data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yen
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got an idea. The question mentions using a 4X-Large virtual warehouse to query the reporting tables. Maybe we could try increasing the warehouse size to a 5X-Large, as suggested in option B. That might help with the pruning performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the question. It seems like the data pipeline is working well, but the reporting tables are the problem. Maybe we need to look at how the data is being loaded into those tables and see if there's a way to optimize the pruning process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veta
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one, but I think the key might be to focus on the pruning of the reporting tables. The question mentions that the reporting tables are not pruning effectively, so that seems like the main issue to address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally confident on this one. I know the Messaging Metadata pattern is about separating the different types of data, but I can't quite remember which goes where. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
5 months ago
This is a tough call, but I think option B is the way to go. Relocating the class seems like the best way to minimize the disruption and keep the students engaged.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the difference between ESP and AH. I'll need to review my notes to make sure I understand the key services they each provide.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
2 years ago
Increasing the size of the virtual warehouse could also help in improving the pruning of the reporting tables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilona
2 years ago
I don't think that would be a good idea. Maybe we should create larger files for Snowpipe to ingest and adjust the staging frequency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
2 years ago
But what if we eliminate Snowpipe and load the files into internal stages using PUT commands instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
2 years ago
Maybe we can try using an ORDER BY command to load the reporting tables more efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
2 years ago
I think we need to figure out how to improve the pruning of the reporting tables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
2 years ago
Or we could also try using an ORDER BY command to load the reporting tables. That might help with pruning too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
2 years ago
That could help improve performance. We might not need to use up more resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
2 years ago
I don't think that's the best solution. Maybe we should increase the size of the virtual warehouse instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
2 years ago
Do you think we should eliminate the use of Snowpipe and load files using PUT commands?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
2 years ago
I agree. The data seems to be accumulating in the reporting database tables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
2 years ago
I think we need to improve the pruning of the reporting tables.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel