MENU
Requirements gathered in workshops should be validated against scope before adding them to the backlog.
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium CIS-ITSM Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
14 comments · newest first
JO
Jose
12 months ago
Not sure if that’s always necessary though.
LE
Lenna
12 months ago
Definitely true, helps avoid scope creep!
GR
Gracia
1 year ago
Wait, are we really debating this?
AL
Alona
1 year ago
Seems obvious, but some teams skip this step.
JA
Jannette
1 year ago
Totally agree, validation is key!
CA
Casie
1 year ago
I believe the answer is True. In our last workshop, we talked about how validating against scope helps prevent scope creep.
WI
Wilburn
1 year ago
I’m a bit confused. I thought we could add requirements to the backlog and validate them later. Is that not the case?
OZ
Ozell
1 year ago
I remember a practice question where we discussed the importance of scope validation. I feel like it was emphasized that it should be done first.
BE
Benedict
1 year ago
I think it's important to validate requirements against the scope, but I'm not entirely sure if it should always happen before adding to the backlog.
ER
Erasmo
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this one. The Scrum Master is responsible for servant-leadership to help the team maximize value, so I think the correct answer is D.
AL
Aliza
1 year ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward Kubernetes question. I'll start by carefully reading through the options and thinking about how each one would work for the health check.
AN
Antione
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. The wording is a bit confusing, but I think option A might be the best choice since it mentions the adoption rate being below expected levels.
IN
Ines
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. A banquet is a formal, ceremonious meal for a large group, usually in honor of someone. The answer has to be true.
LA
Laura
1 year ago
This seems straightforward. The key is to configure the correct IPv6 static routes on the Atlanta and Washington routers to reach each other's networks. I'm pretty sure I can handle this.