Under which circumstances is it appropriate to leave a Problem record in a State of Known Error?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium CIS-ITSM Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
Resolution and Recovery: Once the Root Cause has been identified, determine whether the established Workaround is
sufficient to restore service to related Incidents and prevent the occurrence of future Incidents. If not, you may
decide to implement a permanent fix to the
Problem by creating a Change Request. Once the Change has been implemented or a Known Error State has
been deemed acceptable, close the Problem record.
If a Change is pending implementation, the Problem state should be 'Pending Change' instead of 'Known Error'.
13 comments · newest first
TO
Tonette
12 months ago
Surprised that A is even an option, really?
RE
Rene
12 months ago
D seems a bit iffy, how long do we wait?
VE
Veronique
1 year ago
C makes sense, can't fix what you don't know.
DU
Dulce
1 year ago
I agree with B, pending changes should be noted.
BR
Breana
1 year ago
A is definitely a valid reason.
LA
Laurel
1 year ago
I think option D could be valid as well, especially if the vendor is involved. But I’m not sure if that alone justifies leaving it in that state.
LE
Leigha
1 year ago
I feel like option C makes sense too, especially if we haven't figured out the root cause yet. But I’m not confident if that’s a valid reason to keep it as Known Error.
ST
Stephen
1 year ago
I remember a practice question where we discussed pending changes. Option B seems right since it implies that a fix is on the way, but I wonder if it’s enough to keep it in that state.
AU
Audra
1 year ago
I think leaving a Problem record in a State of Known Error is okay if the workaround is working fine, like option A suggests. But I'm not entirely sure.
MA
Margurite
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. A Foundation Architecture is supposed to provide a common set of building blocks and standards, so I'm guessing the answer is C.
VE
Veronika
1 year ago
Alright, I've got this. The key is to use a local policy on the WLC to segregate the iPads. That should do the trick without needing Cisco ISE.
VI
Vi
1 year ago
This seems straightforward. The question mentions HDX 3D Pro mode, so I'm guessing the maximum number of monitors is related to that.
IE
Iesha
1 year ago
"Standard" sounds familiar too, but I really struggle to differentiate between all these modes sometimes.