Discuss ServiceNow CIS-HAM Exam Topic 8 Question 59

When transferring non-consumable assets between stockrooms, how must they be transferred?

AIn sets of two items

BNo more than 10% of the source stockroom's inventory

CAs a single entity with a quantity of one

DIn groups of ten items

Suggested Answer: C

According to theHardware Asset Management documentation, non-consumable assets are assets that are not depleted or used up when they are applied or consumed, such as laptops, monitors, or routers.

Non-consumable assets are tracked individually in the ServiceNow platform, and each asset has a unique asset tag and serial number.

When transferring non-consumable assets between stockrooms, they must be transferred as a single entity with a quantity of one, as stated in theHardware Asset Management documentation: ''Non-consumable assets are transferred as a single entity with a quantity of one. For example, a laptop is transferred as a single entity with a quantity of one.''

Therefore, the correct answer is option C, as a single entity with a quantity of one.Reference:

Hardware Asset Management documentation

What is Hardware Asset Management?

Get Premium CIS-HAM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

35 comments · newest first

Troy 10 months ago

D seems too high, who transfers in groups of ten?

Mitsue 10 months ago

Surprised that it's not B, thought that was the rule!

Laurel 11 months ago

Definitely not A, that doesn't make sense.

Alline 11 months ago

I agree with C, it's the only logical choice.

Lynda 11 months ago

I think it's option C, right?

Carin 11 months ago

I thought it was about transferring in sets of two items, but that seems too specific. I’ll have to think this one through carefully.

Nohemi 11 months ago

I’m a bit confused about the percentage limit; was it 10% or something else? I hope I can remember the right guideline during the exam.

Jesusa 12 months ago

I feel like we practiced a question similar to this, and it mentioned transferring in groups, but I can't recall the exact number.

Refugia 12 months ago

I think I remember something about transferring items as a single entity, but I'm not entirely sure if it was specifically for non-consumable assets.

Stacey 1 year ago

I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. I'll re-read it a couple times to make sure I understand what they're asking.

Mireya 1 year ago

I'm leaning towards B - no more than 10% of the source stockroom's inventory. That sounds like a reasonable guideline for asset transfers.

Marge 1 year ago

Okay, let me see. It's asking about transferring non-consumable assets between stockrooms, so I need to focus on the requirements for that process.

Rickie 1 year ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully to make sure I don't miss any details.

Colette 1 year ago

This question seems straightforward, I think the answer is C - as a single entity with a quantity of one.

Francine 1 year ago

I see your point, Jules, but I still think the correct answer is C) As a single entity with a quantity of one for better tracking and organization.

Jules 1 year ago

But what if the stockroom has a lot of inventory? Wouldn't it be more efficient to transfer in sets of two items?

Stephane 1 year ago

I agree with Felix, it makes sense to transfer non-consumable assets as a single entity.

Gearldine 1 year ago

Option B is a bit too restrictive, don't you think? I'm leaning towards Option C as the best choice here.

Suzan 1 year ago

↳ replying to Gearldine

Let's go with Option C then for transferring non-consumable assets.

Iola 1 year ago

↳ replying to Gearldine

Yeah, transferring as a single entity with a quantity of one seems more practical.

Tran 1 year ago

↳ replying to Gearldine

I think Option C makes more sense for transferring non-consumable assets.

Ciara 1 year ago

↳ replying to Gearldine

I agree, Option B seems too limiting.

Felix 1 year ago

I think the answer is C) As a single entity with a quantity of one.

Daren 1 year ago

Haha, Option D would be like a game of 'The Floor is Lava' for the stockroom workers! But seriously, I think Option C is the way to go.

Blair 1 year ago

↳ replying to Daren

Yeah, it's simpler and less room for error that way.

Pa 1 year ago

↳ replying to Daren

I agree, transferring them as a single entity makes the most sense.

Sheron 1 year ago

I'm going with Option A. Transferring in sets of two items sounds like a good way to keep things organized.

Dyan 1 year ago

↳ replying to Sheron

I see your point, but I still think Option A is the best choice for transferring non-consumable assets.

Benton 1 year ago

↳ replying to Sheron

Option A could work well for smaller items, but for larger quantities, Option D might be more practical.

Princess 1 year ago

↳ replying to Sheron

I think Option C might be more efficient, transferring as a single entity with a quantity of one.

Adell 1 year ago

↳ replying to Sheron

I agree, Option A does sound like a good way to keep track of everything.

Felicia 1 year ago

Option C makes the most sense to me. Transferring assets as a single entity with a quantity of one just seems logical.

Jin 1 year ago

↳ replying to Felicia

I prefer transferring in groups of ten items to streamline the process.

Loreen 1 year ago

↳ replying to Felicia

I think it's important to transfer them in sets of two items to ensure accuracy.

Nilsa 1 year ago

↳ replying to Felicia

I agree, transferring assets individually makes it easier to keep track of.

ServiceNow CIS-HAM Exam - Topic 8 Question 59 Discussion