ServiceNow Exam CIS-HAM Topic 8 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for ServiceNow's CIS-HAM exam

Question #: 59
Topic #: 8

[All CIS-HAM Questions]

When transferring non-consumable assets between stockrooms, how must they be transferred?

AIn sets of two items

BNo more than 10% of the source stockroom's inventory

CAs a single entity with a quantity of one

DIn groups of ten items

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

According to theHardware Asset Management documentation, non-consumable assets are assets that are not depleted or used up when they are applied or consumed, such as laptops, monitors, or routers.

Non-consumable assets are tracked individually in the ServiceNow platform, and each asset has a unique asset tag and serial number.

When transferring non-consumable assets between stockrooms, they must be transferred as a single entity with a quantity of one, as stated in theHardware Asset Management documentation: ''Non-consumable assets are transferred as a single entity with a quantity of one. For example, a laptop is transferred as a single entity with a quantity of one.''

Therefore, the correct answer is option C, as a single entity with a quantity of one.Reference:

Hardware Asset Management documentation

What is Hardware Asset Management?

by Kris at Apr 30, 2025, 01:31 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIS-HAM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Francine

2 months ago

I see your point, Jules, but I still think the correct answer is C) As a single entity with a quantity of one for better tracking and organization.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jules

2 months ago

But what if the stockroom has a lot of inventory? Wouldn't it be more efficient to transfer in sets of two items?

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephane

2 months ago

I agree with Felix, it makes sense to transfer non-consumable assets as a single entity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gearldine

2 months ago

Option B is a bit too restrictive, don't you think? I'm leaning towards Option C as the best choice here.

upvoted 0 times

Suzan

9 days ago

Let's go with Option C then for transferring non-consumable assets.

upvoted 0 times

...

Iola

13 days ago

Yeah, transferring as a single entity with a quantity of one seems more practical.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tran

14 days ago

I think Option C makes more sense for transferring non-consumable assets.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ciara

19 days ago

I agree, Option B seems too limiting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felix

2 months ago

I think the answer is C) As a single entity with a quantity of one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daren

2 months ago

Haha, Option D would be like a game of 'The Floor is Lava' for the stockroom workers! But seriously, I think Option C is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

Blair

1 months ago

Yeah, it's simpler and less room for error that way.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pa

2 months ago

I agree, transferring them as a single entity makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheron

3 months ago

I'm going with Option A. Transferring in sets of two items sounds like a good way to keep things organized.

upvoted 0 times

Dyan

2 months ago

I see your point, but I still think Option A is the best choice for transferring non-consumable assets.

upvoted 0 times

...

Benton

2 months ago

Option A could work well for smaller items, but for larger quantities, Option D might be more practical.

upvoted 0 times

...

Princess

2 months ago

I think Option C might be more efficient, transferring as a single entity with a quantity of one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adell

2 months ago

I agree, Option A does sound like a good way to keep track of everything.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicia

3 months ago

Option C makes the most sense to me. Transferring assets as a single entity with a quantity of one just seems logical.

upvoted 0 times

Jin

2 months ago

I prefer transferring in groups of ten items to streamline the process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Loreen

3 months ago

I think it's important to transfer them in sets of two items to ensure accuracy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nilsa

3 months ago

I agree, transferring assets individually makes it easier to keep track of.

upvoted 0 times

...