Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

ServiceNow CIS-HAM Exam - Topic 8 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for ServiceNow's CIS-HAM exam

Question #: 59
Topic #: 8

[All CIS-HAM Questions]

When transferring non-consumable assets between stockrooms, how must they be transferred?

AIn sets of two items

BNo more than 10% of the source stockroom's inventory

CAs a single entity with a quantity of one

DIn groups of ten items

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

According to theHardware Asset Management documentation, non-consumable assets are assets that are not depleted or used up when they are applied or consumed, such as laptops, monitors, or routers.

Non-consumable assets are tracked individually in the ServiceNow platform, and each asset has a unique asset tag and serial number.

When transferring non-consumable assets between stockrooms, they must be transferred as a single entity with a quantity of one, as stated in theHardware Asset Management documentation: ''Non-consumable assets are transferred as a single entity with a quantity of one. For example, a laptop is transferred as a single entity with a quantity of one.''

Therefore, the correct answer is option C, as a single entity with a quantity of one.Reference:

Hardware Asset Management documentation

What is Hardware Asset Management?

by Kris at Apr 30, 2025, 01:31 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIS-HAM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Troy

7 months ago

D seems too high, who transfers in groups of ten?

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitsue

7 months ago

Surprised that it's not B, thought that was the rule!

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurel

7 months ago

Definitely not A, that doesn't make sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alline

8 months ago

I agree with C, it's the only logical choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynda

8 months ago

I think it's option C, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Carin

8 months ago

I thought it was about transferring in sets of two items, but that seems too specific. I’ll have to think this one through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nohemi

8 months ago

I’m a bit confused about the percentage limit; was it 10% or something else? I hope I can remember the right guideline during the exam.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesusa

9 months ago

I feel like we practiced a question similar to this, and it mentioned transferring in groups, but I can't recall the exact number.

upvoted 0 times

...

Refugia

9 months ago

I think I remember something about transferring items as a single entity, but I'm not entirely sure if it was specifically for non-consumable assets.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stacey

9 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. I'll re-read it a couple times to make sure I understand what they're asking.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mireya

9 months ago

I'm leaning towards B - no more than 10% of the source stockroom's inventory. That sounds like a reasonable guideline for asset transfers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marge

9 months ago

Okay, let me see. It's asking about transferring non-consumable assets between stockrooms, so I need to focus on the requirements for that process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rickie

10 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully to make sure I don't miss any details.

upvoted 0 times

...

Colette

10 months ago

This question seems straightforward, I think the answer is C - as a single entity with a quantity of one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francine

1 year ago

I see your point, Jules, but I still think the correct answer is C) As a single entity with a quantity of one for better tracking and organization.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jules

1 year ago

But what if the stockroom has a lot of inventory? Wouldn't it be more efficient to transfer in sets of two items?

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephane

1 year ago

I agree with Felix, it makes sense to transfer non-consumable assets as a single entity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gearldine

1 year ago

Option B is a bit too restrictive, don't you think? I'm leaning towards Option C as the best choice here.

upvoted 0 times

Suzan

12 months ago

Let's go with Option C then for transferring non-consumable assets.

upvoted 0 times

...

Iola

12 months ago

Yeah, transferring as a single entity with a quantity of one seems more practical.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tran

1 year ago

I think Option C makes more sense for transferring non-consumable assets.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ciara

1 year ago

I agree, Option B seems too limiting.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Felix

1 year ago

I think the answer is C) As a single entity with a quantity of one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daren

1 year ago

Haha, Option D would be like a game of 'The Floor is Lava' for the stockroom workers! But seriously, I think Option C is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

Blair

1 year ago

Yeah, it's simpler and less room for error that way.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pa

1 year ago

I agree, transferring them as a single entity makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Sheron

1 year ago

I'm going with Option A. Transferring in sets of two items sounds like a good way to keep things organized.

upvoted 0 times

Dyan

1 year ago

I see your point, but I still think Option A is the best choice for transferring non-consumable assets.

upvoted 0 times

...

Benton

1 year ago

Option A could work well for smaller items, but for larger quantities, Option D might be more practical.

upvoted 0 times

...

Princess

1 year ago

I think Option C might be more efficient, transferring as a single entity with a quantity of one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adell

1 year ago

I agree, Option A does sound like a good way to keep track of everything.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Felicia

1 year ago

Option C makes the most sense to me. Transferring assets as a single entity with a quantity of one just seems logical.

upvoted 0 times

Jin

1 year ago

I prefer transferring in groups of ten items to streamline the process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Loreen

1 year ago

I think it's important to transfer them in sets of two items to ensure accuracy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nilsa

1 year ago

I agree, transferring assets individually makes it easier to keep track of.

upvoted 0 times

...

...