Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ServiceNow CIS-Discovery Exam - Topic 9 Question 65 Discussion

Which choice best describes what happens when, by default, duplicate CIs are detected during identification and reconciliation?
C) Each set of duplicate CIs is added to a de-duplication task.
A) A notification is sent to the CI owner.
B) An associated identification rule is created automatically.
D) The next discovery is stopped for the CI that is duplicated.

ServiceNow CIS-Discovery Exam - Topic 9 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for ServiceNow's CIS-Discovery exam
Question #: 65
Topic #: 9
[All CIS-Discovery Questions]

Which choice best describes what happens when, by default, duplicate CIs are detected during identification and reconciliation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Marcelle at Aug 28, 2024, 05:29 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIS-Discovery Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Alexis
6 months ago
This seems too straightforward. Is it really just C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
7 months ago
Nah, it's not A. C is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
7 months ago
Wait, are you sure? I thought it was A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
7 months ago
Definitely agree with C! That's how it usually works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
7 months ago
I think it's option C, right? De-duplication task sounds familiar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
8 months ago
I vaguely recall something about an identification rule being created, but I can't remember if that's the default action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabella
8 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought stopping the next discovery was a possibility, but that seems too drastic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shala
8 months ago
I feel like there was a practice question about this, and I think it mentioned something about adding duplicates to a task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanne
8 months ago
I think I remember that when duplicates are found, a notification goes out to the CI owner, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
8 months ago
Ah, I think I know this one. If duplicate CIs are detected, the default is that they get added to a de-duplication task, so the user can review and resolve the duplicates. That's option C, right? I'm feeling pretty confident about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nenita
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I'm not entirely sure what the "default" behavior is for duplicate CIs during identification and reconciliation. I'll need to review my notes to see if I can figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
8 months ago
Okay, let me see here. I'm pretty sure the answer is C - each set of duplicate CIs gets added to a de-duplication task. That makes the most sense to me based on how I understand duplicate detection to work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
8 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different options and what they might mean in the context of configuration management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I know duplicate CIs can be handled in different ways, but I'm not sure which is the default behavior. I'll need to think it through carefully and eliminate the options that don't seem quite right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused here. There are a few different services mentioned, and I'm not sure which one is the right one to enable verbose logging for. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
8 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the answer is "URL categories." That's the information within Cisco Advanced Web Security Reporting that would be used to generate a report on visited domains. I'm feeling good about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
2 years ago
I think the answer is A, because a notification should be sent to the CI owner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
2 years ago
I'm leaning towards option C as well. It seems like the most comprehensive way to handle duplicate CIs without disrupting the overall process.
upvoted 0 times
Marvel
2 years ago
True, but option C does seem like a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
2 years ago
I'm not sure, maybe we should consider all the options before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
2 years ago
I agree, it seems like the most efficient way to handle duplicates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hobert
2 years ago
I think option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mari
2 years ago
Haha, option D is definitely the funniest one. Imagine the discovery process just grinding to a halt because of a few pesky duplicates!
upvoted 0 times
Barney
2 years ago
Yeah, that would be quite the unexpected outcome!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
2 years ago
Haha, option D is definitely the funniest one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maryanne
2 years ago
But wouldn't it make sense to stop the next discovery for the duplicated CI?
upvoted 0 times
...
Coleen
2 years ago
Hmm, I think I'd go with option B. Automatically creating an associated identification rule sounds like a more proactive approach to dealing with duplicates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
2 years ago
I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't it be better to just send a notification to the CI owner so they can handle it themselves?
upvoted 0 times
Annice
2 years ago
But having duplicate CIs added to a de-duplication task could also be helpful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luther
2 years ago
I think sending a notification to the CI owner is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joni
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe it's D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashunda
2 years ago
Option C seems like the most logical choice. It makes sense to add the duplicate CIs to a de-duplication task for further investigation.
upvoted 0 times
Yuriko
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but option D seems like it could also be a valid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terry
2 years ago
I think option A could also be a possibility, sending a notification to the CI owner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
2 years ago
I agree, option C does seem like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maryanne
2 years ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel