ServiceNow CIS-Discovery Exam - Topic 9 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for ServiceNow's CIS-Discovery exam

Question #: 65
Topic #: 9

Which choice best describes what happens when, by default, duplicate CIs are detected during identification and reconciliation?

AA notification is sent to the CI owner.

BAn associated identification rule is created automatically.

CEach set of duplicate CIs is added to a de-duplication task.

DThe next discovery is stopped for the CI that is duplicated.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Marcelle at Aug 28, 2024, 05:29 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIS-Discovery Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Alexis

3 months ago

This seems too straightforward. Is it really just C?

upvoted 0 times

...

Denise

4 months ago

Nah, it's not A. C is the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Earleen

4 months ago

Wait, are you sure? I thought it was A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Truman

4 months ago

Definitely agree with C! That's how it usually works.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eden

4 months ago

I think it's option C, right? De-duplication task sounds familiar.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johnetta

5 months ago

I vaguely recall something about an identification rule being created, but I can't remember if that's the default action.

upvoted 0 times

...

Isabella

5 months ago

I’m a bit confused; I thought stopping the next discovery was a possibility, but that seems too drastic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shala

5 months ago

I feel like there was a practice question about this, and I think it mentioned something about adding duplicates to a task.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joanne

5 months ago

I think I remember that when duplicates are found, a notification goes out to the CI owner, but I'm not entirely sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ah, I think I know this one. If duplicate CIs are detected, the default is that they get added to a de-duplication task, so the user can review and resolve the duplicates. That's option C, right? I'm feeling pretty confident about that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nenita

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by this question. I'm not entirely sure what the "default" behavior is for duplicate CIs during identification and reconciliation. I'll need to review my notes to see if I can figure this out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laticia

5 months ago

Okay, let me see here. I'm pretty sure the answer is C - each set of duplicate CIs gets added to a de-duplication task. That makes the most sense to me based on how I understand duplicate detection to work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ira

5 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different options and what they might mean in the context of configuration management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicitas

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I know duplicate CIs can be handled in different ways, but I'm not sure which is the default behavior. I'll need to think it through carefully and eliminate the options that don't seem quite right.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryln

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused here. There are a few different services mentioned, and I'm not sure which one is the right one to enable verbose logging for. I'll need to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aliza

5 months ago

I'm pretty confident that the answer is "URL categories." That's the information within Cisco Advanced Web Security Reporting that would be used to generate a report on visited domains. I'm feeling good about this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlene

2 years ago

I think the answer is A, because a notification should be sent to the CI owner.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maynard

2 years ago

I'm leaning towards option C as well. It seems like the most comprehensive way to handle duplicate CIs without disrupting the overall process.

upvoted 0 times

Marvel

1 year ago

True, but option C does seem like a good solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Billye

1 year ago

I'm not sure, maybe we should consider all the options before deciding.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelina

1 year ago

I agree, it seems like the most efficient way to handle duplicates.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hobert

1 year ago

I think option C is the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mari

2 years ago

Haha, option D is definitely the funniest one. Imagine the discovery process just grinding to a halt because of a few pesky duplicates!

upvoted 0 times

Barney

1 year ago

Yeah, that would be quite the unexpected outcome!

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephanie

1 year ago

Haha, option D is definitely the funniest one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryanne

2 years ago

But wouldn't it make sense to stop the next discovery for the duplicated CI?

upvoted 0 times

...

Coleen

2 years ago

Hmm, I think I'd go with option B. Automatically creating an associated identification rule sounds like a more proactive approach to dealing with duplicates.

upvoted 0 times

...