Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ServiceNow CAD Exam - Topic 5 Question 49 Discussion

Posted by Howard on Mar 01, 2023 at 03:36 AM

A customer requests the following data quality measures be added:

1. Incident numbers should be read-only on all lists and forms, for all users.

2. Short Description field should be mandatory, on all records, across all applications, on Insert.

Which type of policy would you use to meet this requirement?

Get Premium CAD Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
AU
Audria 12 months ago
Not sure if a single policy can handle both requests effectively.
DI
Dierdre 12 months ago
Field Criteria Policy could also work for the mandatory field.
KE
Kenny 1 year ago
Wait, why would incident numbers need to be read-only? Seems odd.
LI
Lizbeth 1 year ago
Definitely agree with that!
SH
Sherita 1 year ago
I think a Data Quality Policy would cover both requirements.
KR
Kristal 1 year ago
I’m leaning towards Data Policy, but I’m not confident. It seems like it could cover both requirements.
OL
Ollie 1 year ago
I feel like this is similar to a practice question we did on making fields read-only. Maybe Dictionary Design Policy could be the answer?
LI
Ling 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about Field Criteria Policy being used for mandatory fields.
TR
Tran 1 year ago
I think we might need a Data Quality Policy for this since it involves ensuring data integrity across applications.
SE
Selma 1 year ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Based on my understanding of Cisco networking and Python, I think Option B is the correct answer.
NA
Nancey 1 year ago
Okay, let's see. Routers and switches have built-in monitoring capabilities, so those wouldn't require extra hardware. Hubs, on the other hand, just blindly forward traffic, so you'd need something like a network tap or port mirroring to monitor a hub-based network. I'm going with C.
AL
Alaine 1 year ago
I vaguely remember something about FreeDBStorage being relevant too, but I thought that was more related to databases rather than instances.
BL
Blondell 1 year ago
Hmm, this one seems a bit tricky. I'll need to think carefully about the model numbers and Intel's processor naming conventions.
ME
Melodie 1 year ago
As someone who's spilled coffee on their laptop during an exam, I can appreciate the need for read-only incident numbers. Wouldn't want to accidentally delete that history!
LI
Lindsay 1 year ago
↳ replying to Melodie
A: And we can make the Short Description field mandatory on Insert with that policy as well.
EL
Elenore 1 year ago
↳ replying to Melodie
B: Yeah, that sounds like the best option to ensure the incident numbers are read-only for all users.
EL
Elbert 1 year ago
↳ replying to Melodie
A: I think we should use a Data Quality Policy to meet this requirement.
AL
Aleisha 1 year ago
Dictionary Design Policy? Really? That's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. Data Quality Policy is the way to go here.
MI
Micheline 1 year ago
↳ replying to Aleisha
Data Quality Policy would definitely be the most appropriate choice in this scenario.
AR
Aracelis 1 year ago
↳ replying to Aleisha
Yeah, Dictionary Design Policy seems like overkill for these data quality measures.
TY
Ty 1 year ago
↳ replying to Aleisha
I agree, Data Quality Policy is the best option for this requirement.
ME
Mel 2 years ago
I was leaning towards Field Criteria Policy, but the requirements span across multiple applications, so Data Quality Policy makes more sense.
IZ
Izetta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mel
Data Policy could also work, but Data Quality Policy seems more specific to the requirement.
CR
Cruz 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mel
Field Criteria Policy may not be sufficient for this scenario.
QU
Queen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mel
I agree, it covers the requirement for all users and across all applications.
SA
Sang 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mel
I think Data Quality Policy would be the best choice.
PR
Providencia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mel
Yes, Data Quality Policy would be the most suitable for enforcing those data quality measures across all applications.
FR
Fredric 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mel
Data Quality Policy definitely seems like the way to go to meet those specific requirements.
RO
Roxane 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mel
I agree, it seems like the most comprehensive option to ensure consistency across all applications.
HE
Herman 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mel
I think Data Quality Policy would be the best choice for this scenario.
LU
Luis 2 years ago
Data Policy seems like a good option too, but Data Quality Policy is probably more specific to these kinds of data quality measures.
PE
Pearlene 2 years ago
I think the correct answer is Data Quality Policy. It seems like the best fit to handle both read-only incident numbers and mandatory short description field requirements.
TY
Tyisha 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think a Data Quality Policy could also work for this scenario.
JI
Jimmie 2 years ago
I agree with Rosalind, a Field Criteria Policy would be the best choice to make those changes.
RO
Rosalind 2 years ago
I think we should use a Field Criteria Policy for this requirement.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel