Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ScrumStudy SMC Exam - Topic 4 Question 122 Discussion

As a Scrum Master, you have to coordinate with the Product Owner to ensure that an appropriate Length ofSprint is determined keeping in mind the changes expected. Which of the following statements is true in thisregard?
A) It is advisable to consider the Release Dates for the overall product or service to determine the Length of Sprint.
B) The impact and frequency of expected changes do not have any impact on the decision related to the Length of Sprint.
C) If the project is stable, with only minor changes expected, the Length of Sprint should be relatively shorter, 1 to 3 weeks.
D) To get maximum benefits from a Scrum project, it is always recommended to keep the Sprint Time-boxed to 6 weeks. : If project requirements are generally stable and major changes are not expected in the near future, the Length of a Sprint may be set to be longer, 4 to 6 weeks. This provides stability to the Scrum Team members to work on the Prioritized Product Backlog requirements for lengthy periods of time without having to go through the Create User Stories, Approve, Estimate and Commit User Stories, Create Tasks, Estimate Task, and other related processes that are conducted for every Sprint. However, if project requirements are not very well defined or if significant changes are expected in the immediate future, the Length of Sprint may be relatively shorter, 1 to 3 weeks. This provides stability to the Scrum Team members to work on shorter Sprints and deliver results, which can be evaluated by the Product Owner and stakeholders at the end of the Sprint. This also provides enough flexibility for them to clarify requirements and make changes to the Prioritized Product Backlog at the end of each Sprint.

ScrumStudy SMC Exam - Topic 4 Question 122 Discussion

Actual exam question for ScrumStudy's SMC exam
Question #: 122
Topic #: 4
[All SMC Questions]

As a Scrum Master, you have to coordinate with the Product Owner to ensure that an appropriate Length of

Sprint is determined keeping in mind the changes expected. Which of the following statements is true in this

regard?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Gregoria at Mar 04, 2026, 08:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SMC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Olive
5 hours ago
I think 6 weeks is too long for most projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
5 days ago
Totally agree, flexibility is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenore
11 days ago
A shorter Sprint is better for changing requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
16 days ago
Not sure about that, what if requirements change suddenly?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tandra
2 months ago
I think Release Dates should definitely be considered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
2 months ago
Wait, 6 weeks? That seems too long for a Sprint!
upvoted 0 times
...
Annalee
2 months ago
Totally agree, shorter Sprints are better for adapting to changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
3 months ago
A longer Sprint can be good if changes are minimal!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
3 months ago
I feel like D is too rigid; I don't think 6 weeks is always the best option. It seems like flexibility is key in Scrum.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
3 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we talked about shorter Sprints being better for projects with frequent changes. So, C might be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
3 months ago
I’m not sure about B; I think changes definitely impact the Sprint length, but I can't recall the exact reasoning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
3 months ago
I remember discussing how the length of a Sprint should align with the stability of project requirements. It seems like A could be a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
3 months ago
I feel like option D is definitely wrong; 6 weeks seems too long for most projects, especially if we want to stay agile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we talked about shorter Sprints being better for projects with frequent changes, so I might lean towards that idea here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
4 months ago
I think option A makes sense since release dates can influence how we plan our Sprints, but I’m not entirely confident about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
4 months ago
I remember discussing how the Length of Sprint should align with the stability of project requirements, but I'm not sure if 4 to 6 weeks is always the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel