Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ScrumStudy SMC Exam - Topic 4 Question 111 Discussion

Posted by Fredric on May 04, 2025 at 05:41 PM

Which of the following statements about non-core Scrum roles is correct?

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium SMC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
JE
Jettie 10 months ago
I’m not sure about that, sounds like a stretch to me.
NA
Nathan 10 months ago
Non-core roles can really make a difference, though!
TA
Tamar 10 months ago
Wait, are you saying they have no interest? That seems off.
WH
Whitney 10 months ago
I agree, they just support the main roles.
RI
Rikki 11 months ago
Non-core roles are definitely not mandatory for success.
RE
Reta 11 months ago
D seems off too; I don’t recall non-core roles having a formal stature in the Scrum process.
SH
Sheridan 11 months ago
I feel like C is definitely wrong because non-core roles should have some interest in the project, right?
KE
Kerrie 11 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I remember something about non-core roles not being directly responsible for the project’s outcome.
RI
Rikki 12 months ago
I think non-core roles are more about support rather than being mandatory for success, so maybe B is the right choice?
AZ
Azalee 12 months ago
I remember learning about this in class. Non-core roles are supportive, but not directly responsible for the project's outcome. I'll go with B.
DY
Dyan 12 months ago
Okay, let me see. I know non-core roles are not mandatory, but they can still impact the project's success. I think option B sounds right.
DO
Dona 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the difference between core and non-core Scrum roles. I'll need to think this through carefully.
LI
Linette 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, I'm pretty confident I can identify the correct statement about non-core Scrum roles.
EM
Emogene 1 year ago
I disagree, Keneth. Non-core roles may not have a formal stature but still play a crucial role in the project's success.
KE
Keneth 1 year ago
I believe option D is correct. Non-core roles have a formal stature and are continuously involved.
EL
Elfriede 1 year ago
I agree with you, Vivienne. Non-core roles are supportive and indirectly impact the project.
JE
Jerlene 1 year ago
B definitely sounds right. These non-core roles provide valuable support, even if they're not the ones driving the main work.
DE
Devorah 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jerlene
User 4: It's important to recognize the value they bring to the team.
EL
Elly 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jerlene
User 3: Without them, the project might not run as smoothly.
RI
Rickie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jerlene
User 2: Yeah, they may not be mandatory, but they play a crucial role.
AL
Aleshia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jerlene
User 1: I agree, non-core roles are definitely supportive.
AR
Arthur 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jerlene
D) Non-core roles have a formal stature on the project team and are continuously involved in the Scrum process.
NO
Norah 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jerlene
Yes, they play a crucial role in supporting the core team.
SH
Shenika 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jerlene
B) Non-core roles are supportive roles indirectly responsible for the success or failure of the project.
DE
Delsie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jerlene
A) Non-core roles are mandatorily required for the Scrum project to be successful.
VI
Vivienne 1 year ago
I think the correct statement is B.
DE
Dell 1 year ago
Haha, option C is just silly. How can you be involved in a project but have no interest in it? That makes no sense!
ME
Merissa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dell
User 3: Option B seems more accurate, non-core roles play a supportive role in the project.
LE
Leota 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dell
User 2: Definitely, non-core roles may not be directly involved, but they still have an interest in the project.
WI
Willow 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dell
User 1: I agree, option C doesn't make sense at all.
TO
Toshia 1 year ago
I'd have to go with D. The non-core roles have a formal presence on the team and are continuously involved in the Scrum process.
CO
Coral 1 year ago
Option B seems the most accurate to me. The non-core roles may not be directly responsible for the project, but they can certainly impact its success.
OL
Oliva 1 year ago
↳ replying to Coral
It's important to recognize the value of non-core roles in the success of a Scrum project.
HO
Holley 1 year ago
↳ replying to Coral
Yes, they may not have a formal stature, but their contribution can make a difference.
DY
Dylan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Coral
I agree, non-core roles may not be mandatory but they definitely play a supportive role.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel