New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ScrumStudy SMC Exam - Topic 4 Question 111 Discussion

Actual exam question for ScrumStudy's SMC exam
Question #: 111
Topic #: 4
[All SMC Questions]

Which of the following statements about non-core Scrum roles is correct?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Fredric at May 04, 2025, 05:41 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SMC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jettie
2 months ago
I’m not sure about that, sounds like a stretch to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathan
2 months ago
Non-core roles can really make a difference, though!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
3 months ago
Wait, are you saying they have no interest? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
3 months ago
I agree, they just support the main roles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
3 months ago
Non-core roles are definitely not mandatory for success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
3 months ago
D seems off too; I don’t recall non-core roles having a formal stature in the Scrum process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
4 months ago
I feel like C is definitely wrong because non-core roles should have some interest in the project, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerrie
4 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I remember something about non-core roles not being directly responsible for the project’s outcome.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
4 months ago
I think non-core roles are more about support rather than being mandatory for success, so maybe B is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Azalee
4 months ago
I remember learning about this in class. Non-core roles are supportive, but not directly responsible for the project's outcome. I'll go with B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
4 months ago
Okay, let me see. I know non-core roles are not mandatory, but they can still impact the project's success. I think option B sounds right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dona
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the difference between core and non-core Scrum roles. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linette
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, I'm pretty confident I can identify the correct statement about non-core Scrum roles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emogene
8 months ago
I disagree, Keneth. Non-core roles may not have a formal stature but still play a crucial role in the project's success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
8 months ago
I believe option D is correct. Non-core roles have a formal stature and are continuously involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfriede
8 months ago
I agree with you, Vivienne. Non-core roles are supportive and indirectly impact the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerlene
8 months ago
B definitely sounds right. These non-core roles provide valuable support, even if they're not the ones driving the main work.
upvoted 0 times
Devorah
7 months ago
User 4: It's important to recognize the value they bring to the team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
7 months ago
User 3: Without them, the project might not run as smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
7 months ago
User 2: Yeah, they may not be mandatory, but they play a crucial role.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleshia
7 months ago
User 1: I agree, non-core roles are definitely supportive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
8 months ago
D) Non-core roles have a formal stature on the project team and are continuously involved in the Scrum process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
8 months ago
Yes, they play a crucial role in supporting the core team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
8 months ago
B) Non-core roles are supportive roles indirectly responsible for the success or failure of the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
8 months ago
A) Non-core roles are mandatorily required for the Scrum project to be successful.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vivienne
9 months ago
I think the correct statement is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dell
10 months ago
Haha, option C is just silly. How can you be involved in a project but have no interest in it? That makes no sense!
upvoted 0 times
Merissa
9 months ago
User 3: Option B seems more accurate, non-core roles play a supportive role in the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
9 months ago
User 2: Definitely, non-core roles may not be directly involved, but they still have an interest in the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
9 months ago
User 1: I agree, option C doesn't make sense at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Toshia
10 months ago
I'd have to go with D. The non-core roles have a formal presence on the team and are continuously involved in the Scrum process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
10 months ago
Option B seems the most accurate to me. The non-core roles may not be directly responsible for the project, but they can certainly impact its success.
upvoted 0 times
Oliva
9 months ago
It's important to recognize the value of non-core roles in the success of a Scrum project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
9 months ago
Yes, they may not have a formal stature, but their contribution can make a difference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dylan
9 months ago
I agree, non-core roles may not be mandatory but they definitely play a supportive role.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel