Option A? Clearly defined inputs and requirements? In Scrum? Good one! That's about as likely as a Scrum team finishing a sprint on time and under budget.
Option B? Really? Specific inputs leading to specific outputs? What is this, a machine shop? Scrum is more like a fun house, with all sorts of unexpected twists and turns!
I'm going with option D. Scrum is all about transparency and collaboration, so decision-making should be based on what we observe and experience, not some rigid plan.
Option C sounds good to me. Empirical Process Control is about embracing the unpredictable and unrepeatable nature of software development. That's why we need to be open to experimenting and adjusting as we go.
Yes, you're right. Empirical Process Control is all about making decisions based on observation and experimentation rather than detailed upfront planning. It allows for flexibility and adaptation in the development process.
Option C sounds good to me. Empirical Process Control is about embracing the unpredictable and unrepeatable nature of software development. That's why we need to be open to experimenting and adjusting as we go.
I think option D is the best description of Empirical Process Control. It's all about making decisions based on observation and experimentation rather than detailed planning. That's the core of Scrum's flexibility and adaptability.
Transparency is key in Scrum, it allows for open communication and a clear understanding of the process. It's important for everyone to be on the same page.
Eva
12 days agoMi
14 days agoKeshia
2 days agoMayra
22 days agoStephania
27 days agoHerman
28 days agoDortha
9 days agoCordelia
19 days agoZita
2 months agoMalcom
21 days agoMarta
1 months agoInes
2 months agoPatrick
2 months agoBettina
2 months ago