Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Scrum PSPO-I Exam - Topic 1 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scrum's PSPO-I exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 1
[All PSPO-I Questions]

The Daily Scrum is an event that happens every day. What would be three key concerns if the

frequency were to be lowered to every two or three days?

(choose the best three answers)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Carisa at Apr 28, 2024, 06:30 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSPO-I Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Torie
6 months ago
Impediments being resolved slowly? That's a big no!
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
6 months ago
Opportunities to inspect and adapt the Sprint Backlog are lost for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
6 months ago
Wait, why would the Scrum Master need a Gantt chart?
upvoted 0 times
...
Asuncion
7 months ago
Totally agree, daily check-ins keep things on track!
upvoted 0 times
...
Maira
7 months ago
The Sprint Backlog may become inaccurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaiah
7 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think impediments being resolved more slowly is definitely a big issue if we lower the frequency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jill
7 months ago
I feel like the Product Owner's ability to report progress might be affected too, especially if we don't meet daily.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think losing opportunities to inspect and adapt the Sprint Backlog could really hurt our progress.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
8 months ago
I remember discussing how the Sprint Backlog could become outdated if we don't have daily check-ins. That seems like a key concern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
8 months ago
Okay, let's see. If the Daily Scrum happens less often, the Sprint Backlog might become inaccurate, and the Product Owner would have a harder time reporting progress to stakeholders. Those seem like the most critical concerns to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know the Daily Scrum is important for keeping the team aligned, but I'm not sure I fully understand the implications of lowering the frequency. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
8 months ago
This is a pretty straightforward question. The key concerns are around the loss of visibility and transparency if the Daily Scrum frequency is reduced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
8 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The main issues would be losing opportunities to inspect and adapt the Sprint Backlog, as well as slower resolution of impediments. Maintaining transparency is key in Scrum, so reducing the frequency of the Daily Scrum is a big risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorriane
8 months ago
Passing a token around could work, but I worry that might feel a bit too rigid. The timer idea is simpler and could help keep things focused.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amalia
8 months ago
The host ID change when migrating to a solaris10 branded zone is interesting. I'll make sure I understand the implications of that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
1 year ago
The Product Owner is going to have a tough time reporting progress to stakeholders if the team isn't meeting daily. That could get messy.
upvoted 0 times
Kristel
11 months ago
E) Opportunities to inspect and adapt the Sprint Backlog are lost.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisandra
11 months ago
D) The Product Owner cannot accurately report progress to the stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
1 year ago
A) The Sprint Backlog may become inaccurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ciara
1 year ago
Haha, the Scrum Master losing the ability to update the Gantt chart? What is this, 1995? I think we can let that one go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
1 year ago
Ugh, trying to update the Scrum board before a meeting every two or three days? No thanks, that's way too much busywork.
upvoted 0 times
Annette
12 months ago
F) Impediments are raised and resolved more slowly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emeline
1 year ago
E) Opportunities to inspect and adapt the Sprint Backlog are lost.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
1 year ago
A) The Sprint Backlog may become inaccurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deonna
1 year ago
I agree, and I'm also concerned about the loss of opportunities to inspect and adapt the Sprint Backlog. Without that regular check-in, the team might miss important issues.
upvoted 0 times
Ula
1 year ago
E) Opportunities to inspect and adapt the Sprint Backlog are lost.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
1 year ago
A) The Sprint Backlog may become inaccurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stefania
1 year ago
The Daily Scrum is essential for keeping the Sprint Backlog accurate. Lowering the frequency would definitely lead to inaccuracies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
1 year ago
Another concern could be that impediments are raised and resolved more slowly if we don't meet daily.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
1 year ago
I agree with Evette, that's a key concern. We need to be able to make adjustments regularly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
1 year ago
If the Daily Scrum is less frequent, we might miss opportunities to inspect and adapt the Sprint Backlog.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
1 year ago
But wouldn't updating the Scrum board less frequently save time and allow more focus on actual work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
1 year ago
I agree with Isadora, that could lead to inaccurate Sprint Backlog and slow resolution of impediments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
1 year ago
If the Daily Scrum is less frequent, we might miss opportunities to inspect and adapt the Sprint Backlog.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel