New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Scrum PSM-II Exam - Topic 5 Question 88 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scrum's PSM-II exam
Question #: 88
Topic #: 5
[All PSM-II Questions]

At the ninth Sprint Retrospective, the Product Owner is very disappointed and angry. She has determined that the technical debt has increased, and the product is not meeting her expectations. The product will need a few more Sprints to meet the scalability requirements.

Which of the following could be true? Select the best response.

(choose the best answer)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: E

The situation described in the question indicates that there are multiple problems in the Scrum Team that have led to the increase of technical debt and the dissatisfaction of the Product Owner. These problems include:

The Scrum Team has not used the past Sprint Retrospectives effectively to inspect and adapt. The Sprint Retrospective is an opportunity for the Scrum Team to reflect on their performance and identify improvements for the next Sprint. If the Scrum Team has not been using this event properly, they may have missed some issues or opportunities that could have improved their quality and value delivery.

The Developers have not been paying enough attention to quality. The Developers are accountable for creating a potentially releasable product increment that meets the Definition of Done and the Sprint Goal. If the Developers have not been focusing on quality, they may have introduced defects, errors, or inefficiencies that compromise the functionality and usability of the product.

The Scrum Team is not having conversations around technical debt. Technical debt is the accumulation of work that needs to be done to ensure that a product is maintainable and extensible in the future. If the Scrum Team is not discussing and managing technical debt, they may be neglecting some important aspects of the product architecture, design, or code that could affect its scalability, performance, or security.

The Scrum Master has not ensured that the Scrum Team is being transparent. The Scrum Master is responsible for establishing an environment where transparency, inspection, and adaptation can occur. If the Scrum Master has not ensured that the Scrum Team is being transparent, they may have allowed some hidden problems or assumptions to persist that could affect the quality and value of the product.


Scrum Guide 2020, page 13: ''The purpose of the Sprint Retrospective is to plan ways to increase quality and effectiveness.''

Scrum Guide 2020, page 10: ''The Developers are the people in the Scrum Team that are committed to creating any aspect of a usable Increment each Sprint.''

Professional Scrum Master II Course, page 12: ''Technical debt is a metaphor for expressing how doing things in a suboptimal way can accumulate over time and make it harder to change or improve a product in the future.''

Scrum Guide 2020, page 6: ''The Scrum Master is accountable for establishing Scrum as defined in the Scrum Guide. They do this by helping everyone understand Scrum theory and practice, both within the Scrum Team and the organization.''

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Willodean
9 hours ago
Totally agree, they should have addressed this earlier!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylyn
6 days ago
Haha, the Product Owner must be fuming. I'd hate to be in that Scrum Team's shoes right now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
11 days ago
Wow, this question really hits the nail on the head! Technical debt is no joke.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrie
16 days ago
C) The Scrum Team is not having conversations around technical debt.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nida
21 days ago
E) All of the above.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
26 days ago
A) The Scrum Team has not used the past Sprint Retrospectives effectively to inspect and adapt.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
1 month ago
I wonder if the Scrum Master is really doing enough to promote transparency. That could be a big factor in why the Product Owner is upset.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mi
1 month ago
I feel like we had a practice question about technical debt conversations. If they're not having those, it makes sense that the product would suffer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
1 month ago
I'm not sure, but I think if the Developers are ignoring quality, that could really contribute to the technical debt.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
2 months ago
I remember discussing how important it is for the Scrum Team to use Retrospectives effectively. If they haven't, that could definitely lead to issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
2 months ago
Yikes, this sounds like a real mess. I'll need to think through each possibility and try to pinpoint the main issue. Transparency and quality seem like they could be factors here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
2 months ago
Ah, this is a classic Scrum scenario. I bet the answer is going to be something about the team not inspecting and adapting properly. I'll focus on understanding where the breakdowns are occurring.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brinda
2 months ago
This is tough. I feel for the Product Owner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
2 months ago
Okay, this is a good test of my Scrum knowledge. I think the key is to identify the root cause of the technical debt and lack of scalability. I'll need to analyze each option closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricki
2 months ago
Sounds like they really dropped the ball on retrospectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristine
3 months ago
I think E covers it all. They need to improve in every area.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
3 months ago
Definitely, quality has to be a priority!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
3 months ago
Hmm, this is a tough situation. I'm not sure if the Scrum Team has been using the retrospectives effectively or if they've been transparent enough. I'll have to weigh the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
3 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the different options and think about what the key issues might be.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel