MENU
A Developer from the Scrum Team is always missing the Daily Scrum. She feels that if she is doing her job well, it does not matter whether she attends or not. The other Developers on the team have not done anything about it. As the Scrum Master how should you respond to this situation?
(choose the best answer)
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium PSM-II Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
Multiple Scrum Teams could have the same Sprint start dates but it is not mandatory as the importance is on being able to integrate their shippable Increments at the end of their Sprints.
33 comments · newest first
KR
Kristal
11 months ago
Wait, is it really okay to just skip the Daily Scrum?
BU
Buck
11 months ago
Option B sounds like a good way to address it.
MI
Miss
12 months ago
But what if she really is doing fine without it?
ZA
Zana
12 months ago
Totally agree, everyone should be there!
GL
Glory
12 months ago
I think attendance is key for team cohesion.
MA
Makeda
1 year ago
I thought option D was interesting, but it feels a bit off. Shouldn't the Scrum Master facilitate rather than just model attendance?
GA
Gail
1 year ago
I’m torn between A and B. While the Developers should own the Daily Scrum, I wonder if they really understand the impact of missing members.
JU
Judy
1 year ago
I feel like I’ve seen a similar question in our practice exams. I think option C might be too direct; maybe we should focus on the team's dynamics instead.
TR
Truman
1 year ago
I remember we discussed how important it is for all team members to be present at the Daily Scrum to ensure alignment. I think option B makes sense, but I'm not sure if the Developers will really engage in that conversation.
TA
Tammara
1 year ago
I recall a case study where the Scrum Master modeled the behavior they wanted to see. Option D could be a good approach, but I wonder if it might not be the best long-term solution.
CH
Christiane
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where the Scrum Master had to intervene. I think option C could be effective, but it might come off as too direct.
BE
Beckie
1 year ago
I'm not sure if we should just let the team handle it themselves. I feel like option A might lead to more issues down the line if no one addresses the missing Developer.
LA
Lawana
1 year ago
I remember discussing the importance of team accountability in our last study group. I think option B makes sense because it encourages the team to reflect on the value of the Daily Scrum.
CH
Chaya
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit torn here. Capture-replay could be a quick way to get some basic tests up and running, but structured scripting might be more robust long-term. I'll have to think this through carefully.
JO
Jospeh
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to review my notes on Server Protect to make sure I understand the specific conditions that would trigger an alert. I don't want to guess and risk getting it wrong.
LE
Levi
1 year ago
I definitely recall that proof of work is more associated with public blockchains, but I'm a bit fuzzy on whether private ones use it or not.
AR
Arminda
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know protectionism is a complex topic, and I'll need to think carefully about the different rationales a government might use.
BO
Bok
1 year ago
I'll go with Option B as well. It's important to get the team to buy into the process, not just force them to attend. Although, a little humor might help - 'Maybe the Developer is secretly training to become the next Olympic sprint champion?'
MI
Miss
1 year ago
Option C is a bit too direct. The Scrum Master should try to guide the team first before taking such a strong stance. Sometimes a gentle nudge is all it takes.
NO
Norah
1 year ago
B) Ask the Developers, what value they get by having the Daily Scrum with all team members present and what might go wrong if all Developers do not attend.
MA
Mabel
1 year ago
A) You do not intervene. The Developers own the Daily Scrum, so they should deal with any issues with attendance.
PE
Peter
1 year ago
B) Ask the Developers, what value they get by having the Daily Scrum with all team members present and what might go wrong if all Developers do not attend.
KA
Kaitlyn
1 year ago
I agree with Valene. The Scrum Master should facilitate a discussion to help the team understand the importance of the Daily Scrum. After all, it's a key Scrum event.
VA
Valene
2 years ago
Option B is the way to go. Engaging the team to understand the value of the Daily Scrum is the best approach. Leaving it up to the team to address the issue might not work if they're not proactive.
TE
Teddy
1 year ago
B) Ask the Developers, what value they get by having the Daily Scrum with all team members present and what might go wrong if all Developers do not attend.
GR
Graciela
1 year ago
B) Ask the Developers, what value they get by having the Daily Scrum with all team members present and what might go wrong if all Developers do not attend.
GA
Gabriele
1 year ago
C) Talk to the Developer who is missing the Daily Scrum and ask her to always attend the Daily Scrum.
MA
Mammie
1 year ago
B) Ask the Developers, what value they get by having the Daily Scrum with all team members present and what might go wrong if all Developers do not attend.
EZ
Ezekiel
1 year ago
C) Talk to the Developer who is missing the Daily Scrum and ask her to always attend the Daily Scrum.
RO
Ronald
1 year ago
B) Ask the Developers, what value they get by having the Daily Scrum with all team members present and what might go wrong if all Developers do not attend.
LE
Leonida
2 years ago
I think option B is the best choice. We need to discuss the value of the Daily Scrum with the missing Developer.
AL
Aliza
2 years ago
I agree. It's important for the whole team to be present at the Daily Scrum.
LE
Leonida
2 years ago
I think as a Scrum Master, we should address this issue.