Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Scrum PSM-II Exam - Topic 3 Question 18 Discussion

What could be a reason for a Product Owner to delay the start of a new Sprint after the conclusion of the previous Sprint?
C) There is no acceptable reason. A new Sprint starts immediately after the conclusion of the previous Sprint.
A) The QA team has not finished testing the previous Increment before declaring it ready to ship.
B) The stakeholders were disappointed with the Increment produced in the previous Sprint.
D) The Product Owner needs additional time to identify the next initiatives.
E) There's not enough work in the Product Backlog to work on in the upcoming Sprint.

Scrum PSM-II Exam - Topic 3 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scrum's PSM-II exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 3
[All PSM-II Questions]

What could be a reason for a Product Owner to delay the start of a new Sprint after the conclusion of the previous Sprint?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by An at May 03, 2022, 05:29 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSM-II Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jerilyn
8 months ago
What if there’s just not enough work? That could be a reason too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
8 months ago
Sometimes the PO needs to regroup and plan better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
9 months ago
I thought Sprints had to start right after the last one?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
9 months ago
Totally agree, that can definitely hold things up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
9 months ago
The QA team might need more time to finish testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
9 months ago
I feel like we practiced a question about the necessity of having enough work in the backlog, which makes option E seem like a possible reason for a delay.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
9 months ago
I think I read somewhere that stakeholder feedback can influence the Sprint schedule, so option B could make sense too, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
9 months ago
I remember discussing how the QA team's readiness can impact the start of a new Sprint, so option A might be valid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused about option C, though. I thought a new Sprint always starts right after the last one, but maybe there are exceptions?
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
9 months ago
I'm feeling a bit lost on this one. Lean Principles have so many different concepts, and I'm having trouble remembering the specific definitions. I'll just have to guess and hope for the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anastacia
9 months ago
I feel like I read that daily briefings might be too much, so it could be at the beginning and end instead? I might lean toward D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margo
9 months ago
I'm not totally sure about this one. I know Beats is used for monitoring and data collection, but I'm not familiar with how it integrates with Kubernetes. I'll have to review my notes on Kubernetes deployment types to figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
10 months ago
Old software versions could definitely be an issue, but I'm not convinced that's the most likely to be caught during static testing. I'll review the options and try to apply my knowledge of testing techniques.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel