MENU
(Several Sprints into a project, the Product Owner tells the Scrum Master that a key stakeholder has just started using the product. The stakeholder is unhappy with the quality of the product, and the Product Owner agrees with the stakeholder's assessment that the quality is low. How should the Scrum Master respond to the Product Owner?
Choose the best two answers.)
The best answers are B and C because the Scrum Master serves both the Product Owner and the Scrum Team by helping address quality concerns in a constructive, transparent, and Scrum-consistent way. Quality in Scrum is not handled outside the team or delegated only to testers. When a stakeholder raises a concern about low quality, the issue should be made visible and addressed through the Product Backlog, the Definition of Done, and direct collaboration within the Scrum Team.
Option B is correct because quality expectations and stakeholder concerns should be reflected in Product Backlog items when appropriate, and the Developers need to understand those concerns clearly. Option C is also correct because the Scrum Master helps the Product Owner find an effective way to work with the Developers and address the issue empirically.
Option A is incorrect because acceptable quality standards are not solely for Developers to decide in isolation. Option D is incorrect because Scrum does not create a separate tester role responsible for quality. Option E is too passive and delayed. A significant quality concern should be addressed promptly, not simply postponed to the Sprint Retrospective.