Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Scrum PSM-I Exam - Topic 4 Question 101 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scrum's PSM-I exam
Question #: 101
Topic #: 4
[All PSM-I Questions]

(Several Sprints into a project, the Product Owner tells the Scrum Master that a key stakeholder has just started using the product. The stakeholder is unhappy with the quality of the product, and the Product Owner agrees with the stakeholder's assessment that the quality is low. How should the Scrum Master respond to the Product Owner?

Choose the best two answers.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

The best answers are B and C because the Scrum Master serves both the Product Owner and the Scrum Team by helping address quality concerns in a constructive, transparent, and Scrum-consistent way. Quality in Scrum is not handled outside the team or delegated only to testers. When a stakeholder raises a concern about low quality, the issue should be made visible and addressed through the Product Backlog, the Definition of Done, and direct collaboration within the Scrum Team.

Option B is correct because quality expectations and stakeholder concerns should be reflected in Product Backlog items when appropriate, and the Developers need to understand those concerns clearly. Option C is also correct because the Scrum Master helps the Product Owner find an effective way to work with the Developers and address the issue empirically.

Option A is incorrect because acceptable quality standards are not solely for Developers to decide in isolation. Option D is incorrect because Scrum does not create a separate tester role responsible for quality. Option E is too passive and delayed. A significant quality concern should be addressed promptly, not simply postponed to the Sprint Retrospective.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Eliz
17 days ago
I think we practiced a similar question where the focus was on communication. I lean towards option C because it seems proactive, but I’m not confident about the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
22 days ago
I feel like option B could be a good choice too, especially since it emphasizes adding quality specs to the backlog. But what if the Developers are already overloaded?
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
27 days ago
I remember we discussed the importance of collaboration between the Product Owner and Developers. I think option C makes sense, but I'm not entirely sure if it’s the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel