New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Scrum PSM-I Exam - Topic 3 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scrum's PSM-I exam
Question #: 8
Topic #: 3
[All PSM-I Questions]

During the Sprint Retrospective a Scrum Team has identified several high priority process improvements.

Which of the following statements is most accurate? (Choose the best answer.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Merlyn
4 months ago
I’m surprised that D suggests the Scrum Master decides. Isn’t it a team effort?
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
4 months ago
Wait, are we really saying they should decline improvements? C sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
4 months ago
B seems more accurate to me. Prioritizing in the Product Backlog makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
4 months ago
Totally agree with A! It's all about continuous improvement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
4 months ago
I think A is the best choice. They can definitely add items to the Sprint Backlog.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
5 months ago
I don't think the Scrum Master should just pick the improvement. The whole team should be involved in deciding what's most important, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Olen
5 months ago
I feel like we practiced a question similar to this, and I recall that the Scrum Team should always be looking to improve, even if things seem fine. So, I think they should add something to the Sprint Backlog.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irving
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think we talked about how process improvements should go into the Product Backlog instead. It feels like that aligns with the overall goals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamera
5 months ago
I remember discussing how the Sprint Retrospective is a key time for the team to reflect and improve. I think adding items to the Sprint Backlog makes sense if they're high priority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key difference is that workers' comp provides reimbursement for lost wages, while regular health insurance does not. I'm pretty confident that's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
5 months ago
I remember that a higher interest cover is better, so 6 sounds good, but I can't recall the exact gearing ratio we practiced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
5 months ago
Reduced cost? Improved accuracy? I'm not sure those are the right answers here. I think the main issue with fractional factorials is the potential for confounding, where you can't fully separate the effects of different factors. I'll go with that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickie
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, just need to follow the instructions and fix the violations in the API server, Kubelet, and ETCD configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel