Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Scrum PSM-I Exam - Topic 2 Question 52 Discussion

Which outcome is expected as Scrum Teams mature?
B) The Sprint Retrospectives will grow to be longer than 4 hours.
A) They will improve their definition of ''Done'' to include more stringent criteria.
C) There is no need for a time-boxed Sprint, since time-boxes are only for new Scrum Teams.
D) Sprint Reviews will no longer be needed.
E) A Scrum Master is no longer needed since they are a mature team now.

Scrum PSM-I Exam - Topic 2 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scrum's PSM-I exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 2
[All PSM-I Questions]

Which outcome is expected as Scrum Teams mature?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Mirta at Mar 30, 2023, 09:29 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PSM-I Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Angelyn
8 months ago
Wait, are we really saying D? No Sprint Reviews? That sounds off!
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
8 months ago
C is just wrong. Time-boxes are essential for all teams, not just newbies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
9 months ago
I can't believe some think B is true. Longer retrospectives? No thanks!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
9 months ago
I disagree with E. A Scrum Master is still crucial for any team!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
9 months ago
Definitely A! Mature teams always refine their definition of "Done."
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
9 months ago
I feel like a Scrum Master is still important for guiding the team, even as they mature. E doesn't sound right to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
9 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think time-boxing is essential for all teams, not just new ones. So, I would lean against C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmett
9 months ago
I'm not sure about the length of Sprint Retrospectives. I thought they should stay within a reasonable time frame, so B seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
9 months ago
I remember discussing how a mature Scrum Team would likely refine their definition of "Done" to ensure higher quality. So, I think A makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
9 months ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question. Vlocity CPQ is all about configuration, pricing, and quoting, so I'm going to go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carri
9 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to isolate the different machine types - the Windows Server 2016 VDAs, the Windows 10 VDIs, and the infrastructure servers. Putting them in separate resource pools will allow for better resource management and optimization. I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
10 months ago
Resource skills matrix? I'm not sure how that would help with evaluating the risks of an emerging technology. I'll have to think this one through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
10 months ago
This looks like a retrospective rating scenario - they're refunding premiums based on actual claims after the period. I'm pretty sure it's option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
1 year ago
Ditching the time-boxes? That's like trying to run a marathon without a finish line. Good luck with that!
upvoted 0 times
Kristel
1 year ago
D) Sprint Reviews will no longer be needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
1 year ago
B) The Sprint Retrospectives will grow to be longer than 4 hours.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
1 year ago
A) They will improve their definition of ''Done'' to include more stringent criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ranee
1 year ago
Wow, 4-hour Sprint Retrospectives? That's longer than my weekly team-building yoga session!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
1 year ago
E) A Scrum Master? Gone? That's like trying to fly a plane without a pilot. Mature teams still need that guidance and facilitation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
1 year ago
D) Sprint Reviews are essential, even for mature teams. Cutting them out would mean losing valuable feedback from stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
1 year ago
C) What? No time-boxes? That's just asking for chaos. Scrum relies on those time-boxes to keep teams focused and productive.
upvoted 0 times
Hollis
1 year ago
E) A Scrum Master is no longer needed since they are a mature team now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
1 year ago
C) What? No time-boxes? That's just asking for chaos. Scrum relies on those time-boxes to keep teams focused and productive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
1 year ago
B) The Sprint Retrospectives will grow to be longer than 4 hours.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
1 year ago
A) They will improve their definition of ''Done'' to include more stringent criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reyes
1 year ago
B) 4 hours? That's a bit excessive! I think mature Scrum Teams would learn to be more efficient with their Sprint Retrospectives.
upvoted 0 times
Tula
1 year ago
B) 4 hours? That's a bit excessive! I think mature Scrum Teams would learn to be more efficient with their Sprint Retrospectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quiana
1 year ago
A) The Sprint Retrospectives will grow to be longer than 4 hours.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
1 year ago
B) I agree, mature teams should be able to streamline their retrospectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
1 year ago
A) They will improve their definition of ''Done'' to include more stringent criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
1 year ago
C) There is no need for a time-boxed Sprint, since time-boxes are only for new Scrum Teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
1 year ago
A) That's true, continuous improvement is key for mature Scrum Teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamonica
1 year ago
B) I agree, mature teams should focus on efficiency in their Sprint Retrospectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
1 year ago
A) They will improve their definition of ''Done'' to include more stringent criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Francesco
1 year ago
A) Definitely! As Scrum Teams mature, they should continuously improve their definition of 'Done' to deliver higher quality work.
upvoted 0 times
Felix
1 year ago
A) Definitely! As Scrum Teams mature, they should continuously improve their definition of 'Done' to deliver higher quality work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
1 year ago
A) They will improve their definition of 'Done' to include more stringent criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aliza
1 year ago
I also believe that having a clear definition of 'Done' is crucial for the success of a Scrum Team. It helps ensure quality and transparency in the work being delivered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliana
1 year ago
I agree with Val. As Scrum Teams mature, they should strive to continuously improve their processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
1 year ago
I think the expected outcome is A) They will improve their definition of 'Done' to include more stringent criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel