Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Scrum PSM-I Exam - Topic 2 Question 52 Discussion

Posted by Mirta on Mar 30, 2023 at 09:29 PM

Which outcome is expected as Scrum Teams mature?

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium PSM-I Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
40 comments · newest first
AN
Angelyn 11 months ago
Wait, are we really saying D? No Sprint Reviews? That sounds off!
EM
Emerson 11 months ago
C is just wrong. Time-boxes are essential for all teams, not just newbies.
LE
Leandro 12 months ago
I can't believe some think B is true. Longer retrospectives? No thanks!
SH
Sharika 12 months ago
I disagree with E. A Scrum Master is still crucial for any team!
EL
Elke 12 months ago
Definitely A! Mature teams always refine their definition of "Done."
TI
Tijuana 1 year ago
I feel like a Scrum Master is still important for guiding the team, even as they mature. E doesn't sound right to me.
CO
Corinne 1 year ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think time-boxing is essential for all teams, not just new ones. So, I would lean against C.
EM
Emmett 1 year ago
I'm not sure about the length of Sprint Retrospectives. I thought they should stay within a reasonable time frame, so B seems off to me.
NI
Nieves 1 year ago
I remember discussing how a mature Scrum Team would likely refine their definition of "Done" to ensure higher quality. So, I think A makes sense.
CA
Candra 1 year ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question. Vlocity CPQ is all about configuration, pricing, and quoting, so I'm going to go with option A.
CA
Carri 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to isolate the different machine types - the Windows Server 2016 VDAs, the Windows 10 VDIs, and the infrastructure servers. Putting them in separate resource pools will allow for better resource management and optimization. I'll go with option A.
CE
Cecil 1 year ago
Resource skills matrix? I'm not sure how that would help with evaluating the risks of an emerging technology. I'll have to think this one through.
RO
Rosio 1 year ago
This looks like a retrospective rating scenario - they're refunding premiums based on actual claims after the period. I'm pretty sure it's option B.
TE
Tegan 1 year ago
Ditching the time-boxes? That's like trying to run a marathon without a finish line. Good luck with that!
KR
Kristel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tegan
D) Sprint Reviews will no longer be needed.
KA
Kayleigh 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tegan
B) The Sprint Retrospectives will grow to be longer than 4 hours.
YO
Yoko 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tegan
A) They will improve their definition of ''Done'' to include more stringent criteria.
RA
Ranee 1 year ago
Wow, 4-hour Sprint Retrospectives? That's longer than my weekly team-building yoga session!
CE
Cecilia 1 year ago
E) A Scrum Master? Gone? That's like trying to fly a plane without a pilot. Mature teams still need that guidance and facilitation.
ER
Ernest 1 year ago
D) Sprint Reviews are essential, even for mature teams. Cutting them out would mean losing valuable feedback from stakeholders.
CH
Charlene 1 year ago
C) What? No time-boxes? That's just asking for chaos. Scrum relies on those time-boxes to keep teams focused and productive.
HO
Hollis 1 year ago
↳ replying to Charlene
E) A Scrum Master is no longer needed since they are a mature team now.
YV
Yvette 1 year ago
↳ replying to Charlene
C) What? No time-boxes? That's just asking for chaos. Scrum relies on those time-boxes to keep teams focused and productive.
RO
Rolland 1 year ago
↳ replying to Charlene
B) The Sprint Retrospectives will grow to be longer than 4 hours.
VA
Vanna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Charlene
A) They will improve their definition of ''Done'' to include more stringent criteria.
RE
Reyes 1 year ago
B) 4 hours? That's a bit excessive! I think mature Scrum Teams would learn to be more efficient with their Sprint Retrospectives.
TU
Tula 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reyes
B) 4 hours? That's a bit excessive! I think mature Scrum Teams would learn to be more efficient with their Sprint Retrospectives.
QU
Quiana 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reyes
A) The Sprint Retrospectives will grow to be longer than 4 hours.
NI
Nikita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reyes
B) I agree, mature teams should be able to streamline their retrospectives.
DE
Devorah 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reyes
A) They will improve their definition of ''Done'' to include more stringent criteria.
JA
Jaime 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reyes
C) There is no need for a time-boxed Sprint, since time-boxes are only for new Scrum Teams.
LA
Lashandra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reyes
A) That's true, continuous improvement is key for mature Scrum Teams.
LA
Lamonica 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reyes
B) I agree, mature teams should focus on efficiency in their Sprint Retrospectives.
LA
Lawrence 1 year ago
↳ replying to Reyes
A) They will improve their definition of ''Done'' to include more stringent criteria.
FR
Francesco 1 year ago
A) Definitely! As Scrum Teams mature, they should continuously improve their definition of 'Done' to deliver higher quality work.
FE
Felix 1 year ago
↳ replying to Francesco
A) Definitely! As Scrum Teams mature, they should continuously improve their definition of 'Done' to deliver higher quality work.
KI
Kiley 1 year ago
↳ replying to Francesco
A) They will improve their definition of 'Done' to include more stringent criteria.
AL
Aliza 2 years ago
I also believe that having a clear definition of 'Done' is crucial for the success of a Scrum Team. It helps ensure quality and transparency in the work being delivered.
JU
Juliana 2 years ago
I agree with Val. As Scrum Teams mature, they should strive to continuously improve their processes.
VA
Val 2 years ago
I think the expected outcome is A) They will improve their definition of 'Done' to include more stringent criteria.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel