Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Scrum PSM-I Exam - Topic 3 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scrum's PSM-I exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 3
[All PSM-I Questions]

What are two ways that architecture and infrastructure are handled in Scrum? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Architecture and infrastructure are handled in Scrum by implementing them along with functional development of the product, and by adding them to the Product Backlog and addressing them in early Sprints, while always requiring at least some business functionality, no matter how small, as stated in [2]: ''Scrum does not distinguish between developing functionality or architecture. They are developed together, as they are both important and support each other. Architecture is not a separate phase; it is part of the product development. Architecture is added to the Product Backlog as any other feature or functionality.''


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Helaine
5 months ago
Separate teams for architecture? Not sure that’s the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfred
5 months ago
Surprised to see that they can be added to the backlog like that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanne
5 months ago
I think they should be documented first, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
6 months ago
Totally agree, architecture should evolve with the product!
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
6 months ago
They’re implemented along with functional development.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
6 months ago
I definitely remember that they need to be addressed early on, so C sounds right. But I’m a bit confused about whether B is also correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
6 months ago
I feel like we discussed that they shouldn't be fully determined before Sprints, so A seems wrong. But I can't recall if D is about a separate team or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about adding them to the Product Backlog. Could option C be one of the answers?
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
7 months ago
I think architecture and infrastructure should be implemented along with functional development, so maybe option B is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
7 months ago
I feel confident I can answer this question. Scrum emphasizes iterative development, so I believe the answer lies in how that approach impacts architecture and infrastructure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
7 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy - I'll focus on the Scrum values and principles to identify the two most relevant ways that architecture and infrastructure are handled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to think through the Scrum principles and practices to determine the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
7 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key points about how Scrum handles architecture and infrastructure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
11 months ago
A and C, for sure. You can't just slap on the architecture at the end, gotta get that stuff mapped out early on.
upvoted 0 times
Jacqueline
10 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
10 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Franchesca
11 months ago
Haha, good one! I'm gonna go with B and D. Ain't no Scrum without some serious infrastructure, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
11 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I think the right answers are B and D. A separate team building an architectural runway makes the most sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
Shanice
11 months ago
It's crucial to address architecture and infrastructure early in the Sprints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
11 months ago
Yes, a separate team building an architectural runway is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cortney
11 months ago
I agree, architecture and infrastructure are implemented along with functional development.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfred
11 months ago
I think the correct answers are B and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jeanice
11 months ago
I'm going with A and C. You gotta get the architecture and infrastructure planned out upfront, but also make sure it's integrated with the actual product features.
upvoted 0 times
Dusti
11 months ago
C) They are added to the Product Backlog and addressed in early Sprints, while always requiring at least some business functionality, no matter how small.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
11 months ago
A) They are discussed, determined, and documented before the actual feature development Sprints.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ozell
11 months ago
I agree with Yolando, A) and C) prioritize addressing architecture and infrastructure needs in the early stages of development.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
11 months ago
Definitely B and D. Architecture and infrastructure need to be implemented along with the functional development to ensure the product can actually be built.
upvoted 0 times
Nenita
11 months ago
D) They are built by a separate team through the creation of an architectural runway.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lera
11 months ago
B) They are implemented along with functional development of the product.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yolando
12 months ago
But A) and C) make more sense because they ensure that architecture is addressed early on in the development process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe B) and D) are the correct options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
1 year ago
I think A) and C) are the ways architecture and infrastructure are handled in Scrum.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel