MENU
What is one anti-pattern of the Inspect and Adapt?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium SSM Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
One benefit of holding regular system demos is that execution can be measured across the whole ART. A system demo is a significant event that provides an integrated view of new Features for the most recent Iteration delivered by all the teams in the Agile Release Train (ART). Each demo gives ART stakeholders an objective measure of progress during a Program Increment (PI). The system demo offers the ART a fact-based measure of current, system-level progress within the PI. It's the true measure of ART velocity and progress. Achieving this requires implementing the scalable engineering practices necessary to support Continuous Integration across the ART. By holding regular system demos, the ART can evaluate the quality, functionality, and usability of the solution, as well as identify and resolve any issues, risks, or dependencies. The system demo also provides an opportunity for feedback and learning from the customers, Business Owners, and other stakeholders, which can help the ART to align with the vision and goals, and to adapt to changing needs and expectations. (Must be taken from SAFe 6 Scrum Master resources)
System Demo - Scaled Agile Framework
SAFe Scrum Master Course Outline
33 comments · newest first
RO
Rosio
11 months ago
Yeah, I've seen teams struggle with too many ideas in workshops.
MI
Mila
11 months ago
I think too many ideas can actually dilute focus, not just one problem.
LI
Linette
11 months ago
Wait, is it really that bad? I thought we were making progress!
LA
Larue
11 months ago
Totally agree, it’s frustrating when teams just talk without real outcomes.
CA
Carry
12 months ago
A common issue is when no actionable improvements come out of the sessions.
EL
Elli
12 months ago
I recall a practice question where only one problem was identified in retrospectives, and that seemed like a red flag for me. It feels limiting.
FR
France
12 months ago
I feel like the issue with team members not attending the demo could be significant too. It might lead to a lack of feedback.
JE
Jess
1 year ago
I'm not really sure, but I remember something about too many ideas being a problem in workshops. That could be an anti-pattern, right?
MA
Marti
1 year ago
I think the anti-pattern might be related to not having actionable improvements. It seems like if we don't create features, we're just stuck.
KA
Karina
1 year ago
I think the answer is C - Too many ideas enter the problem-solving workshop. That seems like it could be an anti-pattern, as it might make it difficult to focus and prioritize the most important improvements.
SA
Samira
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The options all seem plausible, but I'm not sure which one is the best answer. I'll have to review my notes and try to remember the key principles of Inspect and Adapt.
CA
Casey
1 year ago
Okay, let me see. I know the Inspect and Adapt process is about identifying areas for improvement and then taking action. So I'm guessing the anti-pattern would be not actually creating any actionable improvements, like option A suggests.
LA
Lauryn
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully. Maybe B or C could also be correct.
IR
Irma
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward. I think the answer is A - No actionable improvement Features are created.
LE
Letha
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. Based on the options, it seems like "Service Protection" could be related to the protection of a specific process or the ability of the Traps agent to protect itself. I'll try to remember what I know about the Traps product and make an educated guess.
CI
Ciara
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Does it mean which specific repositories are installed, or just the general categories of repositories? I'll need to re-read it carefully.
OM
Omega
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. Audits are more formal and focused on finding defects, while management reviews are less formal and have broader goals. I think the key is to identify which statements accurately capture those differences.
JE
Jeniffer
1 year ago
I feel pretty good about this one. The key is identifying two different authentication factors, like something you know (password, PIN) and something you have (smart card, debit card) or something you are (fingerprint). I'll go with those types of combinations.
MA
Marguerita
1 year ago
This is a good test of our understanding of CUI prevention. I think a combination of proper inspection, insulation, coatings, and NDE is likely the best approach. But I'll need to analyze each option closely to determine the single best answer.
DE
Desire
1 year ago
Are we sure the correct answer isn't B? Not enough team members attending the PI System demo could definitely hinder the Inspect and Adapt process.
PE
Peter
1 year ago
I was leaning towards option A, but I can see how that could also be a valid answer. No actionable improvement features is definitely an anti-pattern.
KA
Kaycee
1 year ago
Option D seems like a good choice to me. If only one problem is identified, it might not give a comprehensive view of the issues the team is facing.
LA
Lavelle
1 year ago
Definitely, focusing on just one problem may not lead to significant improvements in the long run.
MI
Mirta
1 year ago
I think that's a valid point. It's crucial to address all the issues to improve as a team.
RO
Rodolfo
1 year ago
I agree, it's important to identify multiple problems for a more thorough retrospective.
DO
Dorinda
1 year ago
Option D seems like a good choice to me.
MA
Maricela
1 year ago
I think option C is the correct answer. Too many ideas can overwhelm the problem-solving workshop and make it less effective.
BR
Brent
1 year ago
It's important to streamline the number of ideas in the problem-solving workshop to ensure that the team can effectively address the identified problems.
HA
Hayley
1 year ago
I think option C is a common anti-pattern because it can lead to a lack of focus and difficulty in prioritizing solutions.
MI
Miss
1 year ago
I agree, having too many ideas can definitely make the problem-solving workshop less effective.
MI
Mi
2 years ago
I believe another anti-pattern could be C) Too many ideas enter the problem-solving workshop. It can lead to confusion and lack of focus on the most important issues.
TA
Tasia
2 years ago
I agree with Onita. If only one problem is identified, then the team may not be addressing all the issues affecting their performance.
ON
Onita
2 years ago
I think one anti-pattern is D) Only one problem is identified by each team in the retrospective.