New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Scaled Agile SP-SAFe-Practitioner Exam - Topic 4 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SP-SAFe-Practitioner exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 4
[All SP-SAFe-Practitioner Questions]

What are the four types of team topologies?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

: According to the book Team Topologies by Matthew Skelton and Manuel Pais, the four types of team topologies are stream-aligned, platform, enabling, and complicated subsystem. These team types are designed to optimize the flow of work and information in an organization, and to align with the principles of DevOps and agile. A stream-aligned team is focused on a single stream of work, such as a product, a feature, a user journey, or a user persona. A platform team provides the infrastructure and services that enable other teams to deliver value to customers. An enabling team helps other teams overcome obstacles and learn new skills and technologies. A complicated-subsystem team handles tasks that require specialized knowledge and expertise, such as mathematics, algorithms, or cryptography.Reference:Team Topologies: The 4 Team Types Explained | Shortform Books,Team Topologies | Atlassian,Key Concepts --- Team Topologies,The Four Team Types from Team Topologies - IT Revolution,What are the core team types in Team Topologies?


by Gladys at Sep 16, 2024, 07:47 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SP-SAFe-Practitioner Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rhea
3 months ago
I thought there were more types than that...
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
3 months ago
Yup, that's the right list!
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about those names? Sounds a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karima
4 months ago
Totally agree with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chana
4 months ago
It's definitely Stream-aligned, platform, enabling, and complicated subsystem!
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
4 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen something similar before, but I can’t recall if it was option A or B that had the right terms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalyn
4 months ago
I’m confused; I thought there were different terms for functional requirements and product domains. Is that in one of the options?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
5 months ago
I remember practicing a question about team structures, and I think option A sounds familiar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carry
5 months ago
I think the four types are stream-aligned, platform, enabling, and complicated subsystem, but I’m not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
5 months ago
Hmm, I think the key is understanding how the teams are organized and what their responsibilities are. I'll try to reason through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between the platform and enabling team topologies. I'll need to review those concepts before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
5 months ago
I've got this! The four types are stream-aligned, platform, enabling, and complicated subsystem. I'm confident in that answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karima
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. I remember the four types are related to how teams are structured and work together, but I'm a bit fuzzy on the exact terminology.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
5 months ago
Hmm, this question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key types of team topologies before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
1 year ago
Wait, is this some kind of team topology trivia night? I'm going with B - sounds like the right blend of requirements and domains.
upvoted 0 times
Marisha
1 year ago
I agree with B, it seems to have a good mix of elements for team topologies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
1 year ago
I'm going with A, it includes stream-aligned and platform which are important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
1 year ago
I think B is a good choice, it covers both requirements and domains.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marya
1 year ago
Hmm, I see your point. But I still think the correct answer is A) Stream-aligned, platform, enabling, and complicated subsystem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
1 year ago
Option C? What is this, a trick question? Definitely going with A or B.
upvoted 0 times
Ilene
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards B as well, it seems like a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) Stream-aligned, functional requirements, product domain, and technical could be right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
1 year ago
I think it's A) Stream-aligned, platform, enabling, and complicated subsystem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
1 year ago
I agree, A sounds like the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elsa
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe it's Stream-aligned, functional requirements, product domain, and technical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannine
1 year ago
Hmm, D seems a bit confusing. I'm leaning towards A or B, they sound more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
Markus
1 year ago
Yeah, D does seem a bit confusing, I would go with A as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
1 year ago
I think A is the correct answer, it makes more sense in the context of team topologies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
1 year ago
I agree, A and B are more clear and easier to understand.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Quentin
1 year ago
I'm torn between A and B, but I think B covers the key team types more comprehensively.
upvoted 0 times
Whitley
1 year ago
Let's go with B then, it seems to cover all the key team types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Grover
1 year ago
I see your point, but I still think A is the better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
1 year ago
I agree, but I believe B is more comprehensive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dell
1 year ago
I think A covers the main team types well.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marya
1 year ago
I think the four types of team topologies are Stream-aligned, platform, enabling, and complicated subsystem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
1 year ago
Option A looks good to me. Can't go wrong with stream-aligned teams!
upvoted 0 times
Aleta
1 year ago
Yeah, stream-aligned teams can really help with focus and efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valene
1 year ago
I agree, stream-aligned teams are definitely a solid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel