Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Scaled Agile SP-SAFe-Practitioner Exam - Topic 1 Question 21 Discussion

Which statement describes the information within a Story?
A) A Story provides just enough information for the intent to be understood by both business and technical people
B) A Story is written in full detailed specifications so that the work is ready to be implemented immediately
C) No further conversation is required after the Story is identified because it contains all necessary details
D) Story acceptance criteria must be finalized before beginning Iteration Planning

Scaled Agile SP-SAFe-Practitioner Exam - Topic 1 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SP-SAFe-Practitioner exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 1
[All SP-SAFe-Practitioner Questions]

Which statement describes the information within a Story?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Cecily at Jul 11, 2024, 05:37 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SP-SAFe-Practitioner Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Annabelle
9 months ago
D is crucial, can't start planning without acceptance criteria!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
9 months ago
Wait, are we sure A is right? Seems too vague to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julian
10 months ago
I think B makes more sense, we need details to implement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
10 months ago
Totally agree, option A is spot on!
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
10 months ago
A Story provides just enough info for both sides to get it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
10 months ago
D seems off to me; I thought we could start planning without finalizing all acceptance criteria first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
10 months ago
I think C is tempting, but I recall that we often need to clarify things even after a Story is written.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francis
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like B sounds too rigid for how we usually write Stories.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hobert
11 months ago
I remember we discussed how a Story should be clear but not overly detailed, so I think A might be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
11 months ago
Ah yes, I remember this from our Agile training. The right answer is A - a Story provides the right level of information for both business and technical people to understand the intent, without going into full implementation specs. The other options don't quite capture the purpose of a Story.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabra
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. A Story is meant to provide just enough information for the business intent to be understood, not a full detailed specification. The key is effective communication between business and technical stakeholders, not complete implementation-ready details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem to be getting at the level of detail and communication involved in a Story, but I'm not totally clear on the right answer. I'll need to review my notes on the Agile framework.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamey
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the purpose and content of a Story in an Agile process. I'll need to think carefully about the key characteristics of a Story that distinguish it from other Agile artifacts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julieta
11 months ago
Okay, let me see here. Conscious simulation and conscious integration don't sound like narrow AI to me. And general AI is the opposite of narrow AI. So I'm going to go with D - NLP, that seems like the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
11 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully to make sure I understand the differences between the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
1 year ago
I'm just hoping the real answer isn't 'E) All of the above, and the story itself should be written in hieroglyphics.'
upvoted 0 times
Kathrine
1 year ago
B) A Story is written in full detailed specifications so that the work is ready to be implemented immediately
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
1 year ago
D) Story acceptance criteria must be finalized before beginning Iteration Planning
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
1 year ago
A) A Story provides just enough information for the intent to be understood by both business and technical people
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kathrine
1 year ago
D sounds about right. Nailing down the acceptance criteria upfront is key. Although, if you need to 'finalize' them before planning, you might wanna rethink your process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
1 year ago
C is straight-up nonsense. No further conversation required? That's not how Agile works, my dude.
upvoted 0 times
Lavelle
1 year ago
D) Story acceptance criteria must be finalized before beginning Iteration Planning
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
1 year ago
B) A Story is written in full detailed specifications so that the work is ready to be implemented immediately
upvoted 0 times
...
Sophia
1 year ago
A) A Story provides just enough information for the intent to be understood by both business and technical people
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gretchen
1 year ago
B? Seriously? Full detailed specs? That's like asking for a novel before we even start coding. Let's keep it simple, folks.
upvoted 0 times
Eun
1 year ago
A) Story acceptance criteria must be finalized before beginning Iteration Planning
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
1 year ago
B) No further conversation is required after the Story is identified because it contains all necessary details
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
1 year ago
A) A Story provides just enough information for the intent to be understood by both business and technical people
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashon
1 year ago
Option A seems reasonable, but I wouldn't say it's 'just enough'. Gotta strike the right balance between brevity and clarity, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Alease
1 year ago
Marvel: Yeah, we need to make sure everyone understands the intent without getting lost in the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmett
1 year ago
User 3: I think A is the best option, it should be clear but not too lengthy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
1 year ago
User 2: Definitely, too much detail can be overwhelming.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittani
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, it's important to find that balance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chan
1 year ago
But wouldn't that slow down the process? A seems more efficient to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B. Detailed specifications ensure no confusion during implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chan
1 year ago
I think the answer is A. It makes sense to provide just enough information for everyone to understand.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel