Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Scaled Agile SAFe-SPC Exam - Topic 6 Question 17 Discussion

An Agile Release Train prepares for PI Planning. They have both Features and Program Epics among the desirable items for this PI. However, Product Management is stuck because some Epics are too big and won't fit in this PI.
A) Pick only those Epics that have clearly defined success criteria and might fit into the PI. and B) Split Epics into Features and prioritize the Features to determine what should go into the PI.
C) Split Epics into Features and use capacity allocation to determine what should go into the PI.
D) Instead of planning just the upcoming PI, plan for a longer period to cover the full duration of the Program Epics.

Scaled Agile SAFe-SPC Exam - Topic 6 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SAFe-SPC exam
Question #: 17
Topic #: 6
[All SAFe-SPC Questions]

An Agile Release Train prepares for PI Planning. They have both Features and Program Epics among the desirable items for this PI. However, Product Management is stuck because some Epics are too big and won't fit in this PI.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

by Isadora at May 24, 2024, 12:20 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SAFe-SPC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Dottie
9 months ago
D could lead to scope creep, not sure that's a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
9 months ago
Wait, can we really split Epics like that? Seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
10 months ago
A sounds too limiting, we need to think bigger!
upvoted 0 times
...
Phyliss
10 months ago
I think C is better, capacity allocation helps with planning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaun
10 months ago
B is the way to go, splitting makes it manageable!
upvoted 0 times
...
Phuong
10 months ago
I recall that planning for a longer period could lead to scope creep. It might be better to focus on what we can realistically achieve in this PI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
10 months ago
I feel like picking only Epics with clear success criteria might limit us too much. What if we miss out on something important?
upvoted 0 times
...
Thora
11 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to decide on Epics, and I leaned towards splitting them into Features. It seems like the most logical step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michell
11 months ago
I remember we discussed how splitting Epics into Features can help with prioritization, but I'm not sure if capacity allocation is necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
11 months ago
I think option C is the way to go. Using capacity allocation to determine what fits in the PI makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the difference between Epics and Features. Can someone clarify that for me?
upvoted 0 times
...
Reynalda
11 months ago
Hmm, splitting the Epics into Features seems like a good approach to me. That way we can prioritize what's most important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
11 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margo
11 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Option B is the clear winner in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
11 months ago
Okay, let me see... I know that global choices are available across the entire Dataverse environment, while local choices are specific to a single table. But I'm not sure which one would be the best option here to ensure other users can access the Choice field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
11 months ago
No problem, I've got this. A, B, and C are the correct functions available to grid users. I'm confident in my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question is asking for the command to configure Router 2 as a server-only mode, but the options don't seem to directly address that. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know SSH is used for remote access, but I'm not totally clear on the specific commands for managing authentication keys. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
11 months ago
Okay, let me see if I can break this down. A DHCP client is the host that requests an IP address, not the server that assigns it. So I'm going to go with A on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xenia
1 year ago
What, no option for 'Throw up your hands and go home'? That's my kind of planning approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
1 year ago
A) Pick only those Epics that have clearly defined success criteria and might fit into the PI. Sounds like a good way to keep things simple and focused.
upvoted 0 times
Elden
1 year ago
User 4: And use capacity allocation to ensure we're not overcommitting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alita
1 year ago
User 3: We should prioritize the Features within those Epics to make sure we're on track.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
1 year ago
User 2: Agreed, that way we can stay focused on what's achievable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
1 year ago
User 1: Let's pick only the Epics with clear success criteria for this PI.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashton
1 year ago
D) Instead of planning just the upcoming PI, plan for a longer period to cover the full duration of the Program Epics. This could be a good way to get a handle on those big Epics.
upvoted 0 times
Fatima
1 year ago
C) Split Epics into Features and use capacity allocation to determine what should go into the PI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
1 year ago
B) Split Epics into Features and prioritize the Features to determine what should go into the PI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
1 year ago
A) Pick only those Epics that have clearly defined success criteria and might fit into the PI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
1 year ago
C) Split Epics into Features and use capacity allocation to determine what should go into the PI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
1 year ago
B) Split Epics into Features and prioritize the Features to determine what should go into the PI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
1 year ago
A) Pick only those Epics that have clearly defined success criteria and might fit into the PI.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stefania
1 year ago
C) Split Epics into Features and use capacity allocation to determine what should go into the PI. I like the idea of considering the team's capacity when deciding what to include.
upvoted 0 times
Freida
1 year ago
User 4: Definitely. We don't want to overload the team and risk not delivering on our commitments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
1 year ago
User 3: I agree. It's important to consider the team's capacity when planning for the PI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
1 year ago
User 2: That sounds like a good approach. We need to make sure we can realistically complete everything in the PI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hui
1 year ago
User 1: Let's split the Epics into Features and use capacity allocation to decide what goes into the PI.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Levi
1 year ago
But what if we split the Epics into Features and prioritize them instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
1 year ago
I agree with Adell. It will help us focus on what's achievable in this PI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
1 year ago
B) Split Epics into Features and prioritize the Features to determine what should go into the PI. This seems like the most logical approach to me. Breaking down those massive Epics is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Paul
1 year ago
Keshia: Absolutely, we need to make sure we can deliver value in this iteration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
1 year ago
User 3: It's important to have a clear plan and focus on achievable goals for this PI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
1 year ago
User 2: Definitely, prioritizing the Features will help us determine what to include in the PI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, breaking down the Epics into Features is the best way to tackle this.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adell
1 year ago
I think we should pick only Epics with clear success criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel