MENU
Multiple ARTs in a Value Stream typically require coordination at the Value Stream Level.
Suggested Answer: A, D
Get Premium SAFe-SPC Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
33 comments · newest first
LE
Leandro
11 months ago
Definitely true, otherwise it gets chaotic!
LA
Laquita
11 months ago
Wait, I thought they could just sync up when needed?
MO
Mozelle
11 months ago
Yeah, multiple ARTs need alignment for success.
FR
Francine
11 months ago
I disagree, I think they can operate independently.
JO
Josephine
12 months ago
Totally true, coordination is key!
IS
Isadora
12 months ago
I feel like this is true based on what we discussed in class about optimizing flow across the Value Stream.
EL
Elenore
12 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought coordination was more about the individual ARTs rather than the whole Value Stream.
TI
Timothy
1 year ago
I remember a practice question that mentioned the importance of alignment across ARTs, so I’m leaning towards true.
LI
Lindsey
1 year ago
I think it's true that multiple ARTs need coordination at the Value Stream Level, but I'm not completely sure how that works in practice.
MI
Miriam
1 year ago
Yeah, this is a good one. The key is recognizing that with multiple ARTs, you need that higher-level coordination to make sure everything is aligned and flowing smoothly through the value stream.
CH
Cheryll
1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the wording here. What exactly is an "ART" and how does that relate to the value stream? I'll need to review my notes to make sure I understand the concepts.
MI
Michael
1 year ago
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. If there are multiple ARTs, that means there are multiple teams working on different parts of the value stream. So coordination at the value stream level makes sense to align all those teams.
BE
Belen
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully before answering.
GO
Golda
1 year ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. Multiple ARTs in a value stream would definitely require coordination at the value stream level.
CL
Clay
1 year ago
True, unless your Value Stream is a black hole of endless meetings and PowerPoint presentations. Then I'd vote false.
ZO
Zona
1 year ago
True, unless your Value Stream is a black hole of endless meetings and PowerPoint presentations. Then I'd vote false.
PO
Portia
1 year ago
B) False
VA
Valentine
1 year ago
A) True
CH
Charolette
1 year ago
True, but I heard the Value Stream coordinator gets to wear a cape and a monocle. Sign me up!
CO
Cordelia
1 year ago
B) False
CA
Candida
1 year ago
Haha, that would be fun! I think it's important to have someone coordinating everything.
LE
Lemuel
1 year ago
A) True
CE
Ceola
1 year ago
Duh, of course it's true. Trying to coordinate ARTs without a Value Stream overseer would be like herding cats with oven mitts on.
RO
Rory
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this. Wouldn't it be easier to just let each ART do their own thing? Less coordination, more autonomy!
CE
Ceola
1 year ago
A) True
YO
Yolando
1 year ago
B) False
LE
Leslee
1 year ago
A) True
DO
Donte
2 years ago
False - each ART should be able to work independently without the need for coordination.
DE
Denise
2 years ago
True, it makes sense to coordinate multiple ARTs at the Value Stream level to ensure alignment and collaboration.
MA
Maira
1 year ago
That's correct, coordination at the Value Stream level is crucial for success.
IR
Iraida
1 year ago
A) True
MI
Mirta
2 years ago
True - coordination at the Value Stream Level is crucial for overall success.
CH
Cherry
2 years ago
True - because multiple ARTs need to work together to ensure alignment and synchronization.