Scaled Agile SAFe-SGP Exam - Topic 7 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SAFe-SGP exam

Question #: 30
Topic #: 7

What two visual reporting tools can be used to help maintain fiduciary tracking of government technology programs? (Choose two.)

ADetailed spreadsheets

BPro formas

CFeature progress charts

DBurn-up charts

EIntegrated master schedules

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

The true statement about Lean-Agile development and contracting is A. Quality is built-in through collaboration and automation. Lean-Agile development is an iterative and incremental approach to software development that emphasizes flexibility, adaptability, and continuous improvement. Quality is not something that is added at the end of the development cycle, but rather something that is embedded throughout the process. Lean-Agile teams collaborate with customers and stakeholders to define clear and testable acceptance criteria for each work item.They also use automation tools to perform frequent testing, integration, and deployment of the software, ensuring that the solution meets the quality standards and compliance requirements12.

1:Advanced Topic - Agile Contracts - Scaled Agile Framework2:Government - Building in Quality and Compliance - Scaled Agile Framework

by Helene at Mar 03, 2025, 06:52 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SAFe-SGP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Reena

5 months ago

Wait, are burn-up charts really that effective?

upvoted 0 times

...

Belen

5 months ago

A and C are solid choices too!

upvoted 0 times

...

Talia

6 months ago

Definitely A and D for tracking!

upvoted 0 times

...

Marti

6 months ago

I thought integrated master schedules were just for planning, not tracking!

upvoted 0 times

...

Apolonia

6 months ago

I think B and E are more useful.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delfina

6 months ago

I keep mixing up burn-up charts and feature progress charts. I think one of them is right, but I can't decide which!

upvoted 0 times

...

Annice

7 months ago

I feel like pro formas could be useful, but I can't recall if they're specifically for fiduciary tracking.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dusti

7 months ago

I remember practicing with feature progress charts and integrated master schedules in class. They seem relevant for tracking.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rory

7 months ago

I think detailed spreadsheets are definitely one of the tools, but I'm not sure about the second one. Maybe burn-up charts?

upvoted 0 times

...

Edelmira

7 months ago

I've got this! Detailed spreadsheets and burn-up charts are the way to go for tracking government technology programs. The other options don't seem as relevant for maintaining fiduciary oversight.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tiffiny

7 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. What exactly do they mean by "fiduciary tracking"? I want to make sure I understand the context before selecting my answers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Naomi

8 months ago

Okay, let's see. Detailed spreadsheets and integrated master schedules seem like the most logical choices to maintain fiduciary tracking. I'll make sure to explain my reasoning for those two options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nell

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I know spreadsheets are commonly used for tracking, but I'm not familiar with the other options like pro formas and feature progress charts. I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jovita

8 months ago

This question seems straightforward, I think detailed spreadsheets and integrated master schedules would be the best options to track government technology programs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leila

1 year ago

Wait, where's the option for 'interpretive dance'? That's how I track all my government programs. Just kidding, but seriously, C and D seem like the way to go here.

upvoted 0 times

...

German

1 year ago

Integrated master schedules all the way! That's the bread and butter of government program management. And don't forget the spreadsheets - you can never have too many spreadsheets!

upvoted 0 times

...

Ruby

1 year ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about pro formas for this type of question. I'd stick with the options that are more directly related to project tracking and reporting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janessa

1 year ago

I'm going with C and D. Feature progress charts and burn-up charts give a great visual on how the program is doing.

upvoted 0 times

Eun

11 months ago

I find that burn-up charts are especially useful for showing work completed over time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eleonora

11 months ago

Pro formas can also be useful for financial tracking in government technology programs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaun

11 months ago

I prefer using integrated master schedules along with detailed spreadsheets for a comprehensive view.

upvoted 0 times

...

Belen

11 months ago

I agree, feature progress charts and burn-up charts are very helpful for tracking progress.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lonny

11 months ago

I prefer using detailed spreadsheets along with feature progress charts for a comprehensive view of the program.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

11 months ago

I think integrated master schedules could also be helpful in maintaining fiduciary tracking.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erick

12 months ago

I agree, feature progress charts and burn-up charts are essential for tracking progress.

upvoted 0 times

...

Doretha

1 year ago

Detailed spreadsheets and burn-up charts seem like the most logical choices here. Those would provide the necessary financial tracking and progress visualization.

upvoted 0 times