Scaled Agile SAFe-SGP Exam - Topic 4 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SAFe-SGP exam

Question #: 12
Topic #: 4

[All SAFe-SGP Questions]

What type of decision may significantly affect lead time for systems development?

AUsing firm fixed price contracts

BUsing relative size estimating

CApproved budget, required development tools, and dedicated team members

DPrioritizing the product backlog using WSJF

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

According to theGovernment Articleon the Scaled Agile Framework website, using firm fixed price contracts may significantly affect lead time for systems development. The article states that ''Firm fixed price (FFP) contracts are often used in government programs, but they are not well suited for Agile development. FFP contracts typically require detailed specifications and fixed scope, which are incompatible with the iterative and adaptive nature of Agile. FFP contracts also create a misalignment of incentives between the contractor and the government, as they reward the contractor for delivering the minimum acceptable solution, rather than the best possible value. FFP contracts also discourage collaboration and feedback, as any change in scope or requirements may trigger lengthy negotiations and contract modifications.'' Therefore, the correct answer is A, using firm fixed price contracts. The other options are not accurate, as they are not the types of decisions that may significantly affect lead time for systems development. Using relative size estimating (B) is a common Agile practice that helps teams plan and track their work. Approved budget, required development tools, and dedicated team members are enablers, not impediments, of systems development. Prioritizing the product backlog using WSJF (D) is a method of applying an economic view to optimize value delivery.

by Odelia at Jun 22, 2024, 01:16 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SAFe-SGP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lajuana

3 months ago

Really? I didn't think budget decisions would affect lead time that much.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felix

3 months ago

Totally agree with C! A dedicated team makes a huge difference.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcolm

3 months ago

Not sure about D. Prioritizing doesn't always speed things up.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leoma

4 months ago

I think A could also impact lead time. Fixed contracts can slow things down.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eun

4 months ago

C is definitely the right choice. Budget and tools matter!

upvoted 0 times

...

Quiana

4 months ago

I feel pretty confident that the dedicated team members and tools are crucial for development speed, but I wonder if the other options could also play a role.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felton

4 months ago

Using firm fixed price contracts seems like it could affect timelines, but I feel like it might not be the main factor here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elouise

5 months ago

I remember a practice question that discussed prioritizing the product backlog, but I can't recall how that relates to lead time specifically.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alana

5 months ago

I think the decision about the approved budget and required tools could really impact lead time, but I'm not entirely sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alline

5 months ago

Ah, I see what they're getting at. The contract type and the availability of tools, budget, and team members are going to be major factors in how quickly the system can be developed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerry

5 months ago

Okay, I've got this. The key here is to focus on factors that can directly affect the timeline, like the contract structure and the resources available.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheldon

5 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about how different contract types and development approaches can impact lead time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vanda

5 months ago

I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know lead time is important, but I'm not sure which of these options would have the biggest impact. I'll have to review my notes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Goldie

5 months ago

This seems like a straightforward quality control question. I'll carefully read through the options and think about which one best describes a key part of quality control.

upvoted 0 times

...

Verda

5 months ago

Man, these Stark law details always trip me up. I know it's about preventing physician self-referral, but the nuances are tricky.

upvoted 0 times

...

Flo

2 years ago

C is the way to go. Having all the right resources lined up is key. Although, I heard they're testing a new approach called 'Randomize the Budget' to really shake things up.

upvoted 0 times

Evangelina

2 years ago

I agree, having an approved budget, required development tools, and dedicated team members can really make a difference.

upvoted 0 times

...

Enola

2 years ago

C is the way to go. Having all the right resources lined up is key.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ernest

2 years ago

Option B sounds good to me. Using relative size estimating helps you plan better and avoid nasty surprises. Plus, it's more fun than using a calculator - just eyeball it and call it a day!

upvoted 0 times

Matthew

2 years ago

Prioritizing the product backlog using WSJF can really streamline the development process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gary

2 years ago

Approved budget, required development tools, and dedicated team members are crucial for success.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephane

2 years ago

I prefer using firm fixed price contracts, it gives a clear budget from the start.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelina

2 years ago

I agree, using relative size estimating can definitely help with planning.

upvoted 0 times

...

Berry

2 years ago

I believe A could also affect lead time, as firm fixed price contracts can limit flexibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Art

2 years ago

I'm not sure, but I think D could also have an impact on lead time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hyun

2 years ago

I'd say D. Prioritizing the backlog with WSJF ensures you're focusing on the most valuable features first. That's gotta have a big impact on lead time, right? Although, I heard WSJF stands for 'Wildly Subjective Jargon Factor'.

upvoted 0 times

Brynn

2 years ago

Using relative size estimating could also affect lead time by helping to estimate the effort required for each feature.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mattie

2 years ago

I agree, prioritizing the backlog with WSJF can definitely impact lead time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenna

2 years ago

Definitely C. Having the necessary resources and budget is crucial for timely system development. Who needs fixed price contracts when you can just throw more money at the problem, am I right?

upvoted 0 times