Scaled Agile SAFe-RTE Exam - Topic 1 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SAFe-RTE exam

Question #: 45
Topic #: 1

While facilitating Program Increment (PI) Planning readiness activities, the Release Train Engineer (RTE) notices a Feature that is risky to the teams because the technology is new. Which of the following could reduce the risk?

AEnsure engineering managers are directing the development process

BCoach the teams to create exploration Enablers

CAsk for a presentation of a detailed design before the PI Planning meeting

DMake sure all the technical specifications are written before PI execution

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Herminia at Oct 22, 2024, 09:37 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SAFe-RTE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Christa

3 months ago

C seems a bit late in the game, right? Shouldn't we address this earlier?

upvoted 0 times

...

Tomoko

3 months ago

Totally agree with B! Teams need to experiment with new tech.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonora

3 months ago

Really? I doubt that just writing specs (D) will help with new tech.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yvette

4 months ago

I think A could work too, but it might slow things down.

upvoted 0 times

...

Onita

4 months ago

B is definitely the way to go! Exploration Enablers help mitigate risks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hubert

4 months ago

I feel like having all technical specifications written before execution is important, but it doesn't really address the risk of using new technology.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonio

4 months ago

I practiced a question similar to this, and I think ensuring engineering managers direct the process might not actually reduce risk effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leanna

5 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like asking for a detailed design presentation before the PI Planning meeting could help clarify risks too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brigette

5 months ago

I remember we discussed how exploration Enablers can help teams experiment with new technologies, so I think option B might be the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joseph

5 months ago

I'm leaning towards option B as well. Ensuring the engineering managers are directing the development process or asking for a detailed design before PI Planning doesn't really address the core issue of the new technology. Exploration Enablers seem like the most effective way to reduce the risk.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fabiola

5 months ago

Based on my understanding of PI Planning, I think the best approach here is to coach the teams to create exploration Enablers. This allows them to experiment with the new technology and identify any potential issues before fully implementing the feature.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cassi

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by this question. Wouldn't making sure all the technical specifications are written before PI execution also help reduce the risk? I'm not sure if that's the best approach, but it seems like it could be an option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rueben

5 months ago

I'm pretty confident that the answer is B. Creating exploration Enablers is a great way to mitigate the risk of using new technology, as it allows the teams to experiment and learn before fully committing to the feature.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margurite

5 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure about the differences between the options, but I think coaching the teams to create exploration Enablers could be a good way to reduce the risk.

upvoted 0 times

...