Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Scaled Agile SAFe-RTE Exam - Topic 1 Question 45 Discussion

While facilitating Program Increment (PI) Planning readiness activities, the Release Train Engineer (RTE) notices a Feature that is risky to the teams because the technology is new. Which of the following could reduce the risk?
C) Ask for a presentation of a detailed design before the PI Planning meeting
A) Ensure engineering managers are directing the development process
B) Coach the teams to create exploration Enablers
D) Make sure all the technical specifications are written before PI execution

Scaled Agile SAFe-RTE Exam - Topic 1 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SAFe-RTE exam
Question #: 45
Topic #: 1
[All SAFe-RTE Questions]

While facilitating Program Increment (PI) Planning readiness activities, the Release Train Engineer (RTE) notices a Feature that is risky to the teams because the technology is new. Which of the following could reduce the risk?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Herminia at Oct 22, 2024, 09:37 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SAFe-RTE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Christa
9 months ago
C seems a bit late in the game, right? Shouldn't we address this earlier?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomoko
9 months ago
Totally agree with B! Teams need to experiment with new tech.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
10 months ago
Really? I doubt that just writing specs (D) will help with new tech.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
10 months ago
I think A could work too, but it might slow things down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Onita
10 months ago
B is definitely the way to go! Exploration Enablers help mitigate risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
10 months ago
I feel like having all technical specifications written before execution is important, but it doesn't really address the risk of using new technology.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
10 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think ensuring engineering managers direct the process might not actually reduce risk effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanna
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like asking for a detailed design presentation before the PI Planning meeting could help clarify risks too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brigette
11 months ago
I remember we discussed how exploration Enablers can help teams experiment with new technologies, so I think option B might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B as well. Ensuring the engineering managers are directing the development process or asking for a detailed design before PI Planning doesn't really address the core issue of the new technology. Exploration Enablers seem like the most effective way to reduce the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
11 months ago
Based on my understanding of PI Planning, I think the best approach here is to coach the teams to create exploration Enablers. This allows them to experiment with the new technology and identify any potential issues before fully implementing the feature.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. Wouldn't making sure all the technical specifications are written before PI execution also help reduce the risk? I'm not sure if that's the best approach, but it seems like it could be an option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the answer is B. Creating exploration Enablers is a great way to mitigate the risk of using new technology, as it allows the teams to experiment and learn before fully committing to the feature.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure about the differences between the options, but I think coaching the teams to create exploration Enablers could be a good way to reduce the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
1 year ago
D? Really? Making sure all the technical specs are written before execution? That's like trying to catch a unicorn - good luck with that!
upvoted 0 times
Tatum
1 year ago
C) Ask for a presentation of a detailed design before the PI Planning meeting
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
1 year ago
B) Coach the teams to create exploration Enablers
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
1 year ago
A) Ensure engineering managers are directing the development process
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Colby
1 year ago
Haha, 'detailed design before PI Planning'? Good one, C! That's a surefire way to slow things down and increase the risk.
upvoted 0 times
Sherman
1 year ago
Haha, 'detailed design before PI Planning'? Good one, C! That's a surefire way to slow things down and increase the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
1 year ago
B) Coach the teams to create exploration Enablers
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
1 year ago
A) Ensure engineering managers are directing the development process
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gaston
1 year ago
I agree, B is the most appropriate choice. Coaching the teams to create exploration Enablers is a smart move to tackle the risks.
upvoted 0 times
Caren
1 year ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
1 year ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alpha
1 year ago
Option B seems the way to go. Exploring new tech through Enablers is a great way to reduce risk in PI Planning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haley
1 year ago
I believe C) Ask for a presentation of a detailed design before the PI Planning meeting could also be helpful in reducing the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rocco
1 year ago
I agree with Vincenza. Creating exploration Enablers can help the teams navigate the new technology.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
1 year ago
I think B) Coach the teams to create exploration Enablers could reduce the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel