Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Scaled Agile SAFe-APM Exam - Topic 6 Question 19 Discussion

When dealing with a complex product, what is best defined as a secondary persona?
A) Another user of the primary interface can be accommodated as long as the targeted persona's experience is not compromised
B) Someone the product is explicitly not going to satisfy
C) The consumer whose experience is essential to the degree that it is acceptable to alter the product experience of the primary persona
D) A persona that must be satisfied for the product such that the goals should drive the design process

Scaled Agile SAFe-APM Exam - Topic 6 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SAFe-APM exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 6
[All SAFe-APM Questions]

When dealing with a complex product, what is best defined as a secondary persona?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Buy a Feature is a research game that involves presenting customers with a list of possible features for a product or service, and giving them a limited budget to spend on their preferred ones. This game helps to understand customer needs, priorities, trade-offs, and willingness to pay. It also encourages collaboration and discussion among customers, and generates feedback and insights for the product team.


Buy a Feature: This article from the Scaled Agile Framework explains the purpose, process, and benefits of the Buy a Feature game, and provides an example of how it can be used in a SAFe context.

Buy a Feature: The Game that Teaches Prioritization: This article from Innovation Games describes the rules, variations, and outcomes of the Buy a Feature game, and provides tips and resources for facilitating it.

Customer Needs Analysis: Definition & Research Methods: This article from Qualtrics XM provides an overview of customer needs analysis, and discusses various research methods, including Buy a Feature, to identify and understand customer needs.

by Audry at Sep 16, 2024, 11:58 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SAFe-APM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Delmy
6 months ago
No way, it's definitely about altering the experience for the primary persona!
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
6 months ago
I thought it was about accommodating another user without compromising the main one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
7 months ago
Wait, is it really that simple?
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevieve
7 months ago
Totally agree, that's option B!
upvoted 0 times
...
Adrianna
7 months ago
I think a secondary persona is someone the product won't satisfy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
7 months ago
D sounds familiar too; it seems like it aligns with the idea that secondary personas still need to be considered in the design process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucille
7 months ago
I'm a bit confused, but I think C could be right because it mentions altering the experience for the primary persona.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
8 months ago
I remember a practice question about personas, and I feel like B makes sense since it talks about users we don't prioritize.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
8 months ago
I think a secondary persona is someone who can use the product but isn't the main focus. Maybe it's A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
8 months ago
I'm a little unsure about this question. I know the concept of personas, but I'm not totally clear on how to identify a secondary one. I'll have to think it through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
8 months ago
Ah, this is a good one. I remember discussing secondary personas in class - they're users that the product can support, but aren't the main focus. I'll make sure to apply that knowledge here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asuncion
8 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The key is understanding that a secondary persona is someone whose needs can be accommodated, but shouldn't drive the design process. I'm feeling confident about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording here. I'll have to read through the options again to make sure I understand the difference between the personas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eve
8 months ago
This question seems a bit tricky, but I think I can figure it out. Let me think through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
1 year ago
I'm gonna go with B. Anything else would be like trying to please everyone, and we all know how that ends up. Gotta keep the main thing the main thing, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
1 year ago
C is the answer, no doubt. You can't just ignore the secondary persona - their experience needs to be taken into account, even if it's not the top priority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. These options are really getting to the heart of persona-based design. I'll have to think about this one.
upvoted 0 times
Mariko
12 months ago
D) A persona that must be satisfied for the product such that the goals should drive the design process
upvoted 0 times
...
Aron
12 months ago
C) The consumer whose experience is essential to the degree that it is acceptable to alter the product experience of the primary persona
upvoted 0 times
...
Willetta
12 months ago
A) Another user of the primary interface can be accommodated as long as the targeted persona's experience is not compromised
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hyman
1 year ago
D seems like the best choice to me. The secondary persona's goals should drive the design process, even if they're not the main focus.
upvoted 0 times
Erick
1 year ago
D) A persona that must be satisfied for the product such that the goals should drive the design process
upvoted 0 times
...
Carla
1 year ago
C) The consumer whose experience is essential to the degree that it is acceptable to alter the product experience of the primary persona
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
1 year ago
A) Another user of the primary interface can be accommodated as long as the targeted persona's experience is not compromised
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Earlean
1 year ago
That's a good point, but I still think C is more important for altering the product experience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe it's D because their goals should drive the design process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
1 year ago
I think the best defined secondary persona is C, because their experience is essential.
upvoted 0 times
...
Long
1 year ago
I think B is the correct answer. A secondary persona is someone the product is explicitly not going to satisfy, so the focus remains on the primary persona's experience.
upvoted 0 times
Dana
1 year ago
I see your point. D also makes sense, as satisfying the secondary persona can drive the design process for the product.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
1 year ago
I agree with C. It's important to consider the secondary persona's experience if it enhances the primary persona's interaction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
1 year ago
I believe C is more accurate. The secondary persona's experience can be altered if it benefits the primary persona.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
1 year ago
I think B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel