Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP P_SAPEA_2023 Exam - Topic 6 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's P_SAPEA_2023 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 6
[All P_SAPEA_2023 Questions]

Why would you recommend building SAP Side-by-Side Extensions to an S/4HANA system based on SAP BTP?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The explanation for the correct answer is as follows:

Developer Extensibility is a new extensibility option in SAP S/4HANA that enables customers and partners to create ABAP-based extensions within the SAP S/4HANA system, using public APIs and extension points provided by SAP1.Developer Extensibility is suitable for data-intensive ABAP extensions to S/4HANA, as it allows direct access to the underlying database and data models of SAP S/4HANA, without the need for additional replication or synchronization2.Developer Extensibility also supports the clean core paradigm, which ensures that the extensions are upgrade-stable and do not interfere with the core SAP code3.

Side-by-Side Extensibility on SAP BTP, ABAP Environment is another extensibility option in SAP S/4HANA that enables customers and partners to create ABAP-based extensions on a separate cloud platform, using public APIs and services provided by SAP4. Side-by-Side Extensibility on SAP BTP, ABAP Environment is suitable for applications that are less data-intensive and SAP BTP services that are intensively used, as it allows access to a variety of cloud-native services and capabilities, such as machine learning, integration, analytics, etc., without affecting the performance or stability of the SAP S/4HANA system. Side-by-Side Extensibility on SAP BTP, ABAP Environment also supports the cloud-ready development paradigm, which ensures that the extensions are scalable, secure, and compliant with cloud standards.


by Hillary at Oct 18, 2023, 08:36 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium P_SAPEA_2023 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Trina
5 months ago
Not sure about this, what if there are better options out there?
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
5 months ago
I heard BTP also helps with security context, that's a big plus!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
5 months ago
Wait, is BTP really the only way for Fiori UX? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
5 months ago
Totally agree, it streamlines the user experience!
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
6 months ago
BTP extensions can leverage S/4HANA eventing, super useful!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
6 months ago
I feel like I read that eventing is a key feature of S/4HANA, so maybe A is also a valid point, but I’m leaning towards B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question about user experience with Fiori, but I’m not convinced that BTP is the only option for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
6 months ago
I think option B sounds right because it mentions maintaining user and security context, which is crucial for extensions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
6 months ago
I remember that SAP BTP allows for better integration with S/4HANA, but I'm not entirely sure how the eventing works in practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacresha
6 months ago
This is a good one. The ability to use S/4HANA eventing and maintain the user/security context are definitely big advantages of the SAP BTP approach. I'll make sure to emphasize those points in my response.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
6 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Is the question asking specifically about why we'd recommend this approach, or just the general benefits of SAP BTP extensions? I want to make sure I'm addressing the question correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilford
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key points are that SAP BTP extensions can leverage S/4HANA eventing and maintain the SAP user and security context. That sounds like a pretty compelling reason to use this approach. I'll make sure to highlight those benefits in my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trevor
6 months ago
This question seems straightforward - it's asking about the benefits of building SAP Side-by-Side Extensions on SAP BTP for an S/4HANA system. I think I can handle this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know that SAP BTP allows you to build extensions, but I'm not sure about the specific benefits compared to other options. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully and eliminate the options that don't seem to fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
7 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. The key is to identify which statements are correct based on the PRINCE 2 framework.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
7 months ago
Remember we discussed the Scheme Helper tool in class? I feel like that could really help us figure out which schemes work together without causing conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
7 months ago
This reminds me of a practice question about agency and authority in partnerships. I think the focus here is on Locke's lack of authority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julianna
11 months ago
Option B is the clear winner here. Who needs a consistent UX when you can have a secure and tightly integrated extension, am I right? *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
11 months ago
C is tempting, but I think B covers more bases. Maintaining the user experience is important, but the integration and security aspects of B make it the better choice in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
Colton
10 months ago
I think B is the way to go for a well-rounded solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
10 months ago
True, maintaining the user and security context is crucial for a seamless experience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willis
11 months ago
I agree, B seems like the more comprehensive option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merilyn
12 months ago
I agree, B is the way to go. The ability to leverage S/4HANA eventing is a significant advantage for extensions built on SAP BTP.
upvoted 0 times
Lashonda
11 months ago
User 3: Agreed, building SAP Side-by-Side Extensions on SAP BTP is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
11 months ago
User 2: Yes, and we can also leverage S/4HANA eventing with extensions on SAP BTP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
11 months ago
User 1: I think B is the best option. It allows us to maintain SAP user and security context.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Caren
1 year ago
Option B seems the most comprehensive in terms of integrating with S/4HANA and maintaining the user context. Keeping the security context is crucial for a seamless experience.
upvoted 0 times
Major
11 months ago
B) Extensions on SAP BTP can maintain SAP user and security context and allow the use of S/4HANA eventing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
11 months ago
A) Extensions on SAP BTP technology can easily use of S/4HANA eventing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
12 months ago
B) Extensions on SAP BTP can maintain SAP user and security context and allow the use of S/4HANA eventing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teresita
12 months ago
A) Extensions on SAP BTP technology can easily use of S/4HANA eventing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Walton
1 year ago
I think building extensions on SAP BTP is essential because it's the only option for building a consistent user experience based on SAP Fiori UX styles. It ensures a seamless integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
1 year ago
I agree with Zona, extensions on SAP BTP can maintain SAP user and security context and allow the use of S/4HANA eventing. It's a practical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
1 year ago
I would recommend building SAP Side-by-Side Extensions to an S/4HANA system based on SAP BTP because extensions on SAP BTP technology can easily use S/4HANA eventing.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel