Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam P_SAPEA_2023 Topic 2 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's P_SAPEA_2023 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 2
[All P_SAPEA_2023 Questions]

As an Enterprise Architect, you must ensure that future extensions to the Digital Core of the enterprise guarantee stable and reliable operations. The architecture guideline demands to follow the clean-core strategy. What does this demand ensure and entail?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

https://community.sap.com/t5/technology-blogs-by-sap/integration-solution-advisory-methodology-isa-m-define-integration/ba-p/13397214


by Suresh at Aug 23, 2024, 10:59 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium P_SAPEA_2023 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Hyun
1 years ago
Side-by-side extensibility all the way! No need to mess with the core when you can build on top of it cleanly. Option C gets my vote.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
1 years ago
I see the benefits of option B, direct access to SAP tables can be efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
1 years ago
Ha! Direct table access? That's a recipe for disaster. Option C is the way to go - keep those extensions separate and follow the SAP guidelines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
1 years ago
I prefer option C, keeping extensions separate seems more secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vonda
1 years ago
Option A sounds like the winner to me. Keeping those interfaces well-defined and upgrade-stable is crucial for future-proofing the system.
upvoted 1 times
...
Kaitlyn
1 years ago
I agree, option A ensures stability during upgrades.
upvoted 1 times
...
Erasmo
1 years ago
The clean-core strategy is the way to go. Extensions that don't break upgrades and vice versa - that's what I'm looking for in a robust architecture!
upvoted 0 times
Celestine
12 months ago
C) Extensions are kept strictly separate from the SAP application, Extensions are developed in accordance with the SAP Application Extension Methodology. Side-by-side extensibility options are always preferable to on-stack extensibility options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestine
12 months ago
A) Extensions do not break an upgrade, and upgrades do not break an extension. Such extensions can access SAP business objects only through well defined, upgrade-stable interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kimbery
1 years ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suresh
1 years ago
Hi Experts, Answer should be option A right? Extensions do not break an upgrade, and upgrades do not break an extension. Such extensions can access SAP business objects only through well defined, upgrade-stable interfaces. But practice shows B as correct answer please advise. Thanks,
upvoted 1 times
...

Save Cancel