Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP C_THR96_2505 Exam - Topic 1 Question 2 Discussion

What happens when the Primary Person ID and Secondary Person ID Special Use Type properties are set on a single table?
B) A Lookup is created in the Lookup tab to join tables with Primary Person ID to a Secondary Person ID(s).
A) A mapping is created between the Primary Person within a position and Secondary Person(s) within that position.
C) A mapping is created between an employee's identifier and the employee's assignment(s).
D) A relationship is defined for a parent (primary)/child (secondary) relationship for a supervisor structure.

SAP C_THR96_2505 Exam - Topic 1 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_THR96_2505 exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 1
[All C_THR96_2505 Questions]

What happens when the Primary Person ID and Secondary Person ID Special Use Type properties are set on a single table?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Clarence at Jul 03, 2025, 06:56 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_THR96_2505 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lavina
5 months ago
Wait, really? I thought it was just for supervisors and their teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paul
6 months ago
Totally agree, that's how it works!
upvoted 0 times
...
Breana
6 months ago
I think it's more about the employee's assignments, not just mapping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
6 months ago
Definitely a parent/child relationship in the structure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
6 months ago
A mapping is created between the Primary Person and Secondary Person(s).
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
7 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the differences between primary and secondary in this context. I might need to review the definitions again before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
7 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A because it sounds familiar, but I also remember something about lookups that could fit option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
7 months ago
I remember practicing a question about relationships in tables, and I feel like it could be related to option D, but I can't recall the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
7 months ago
I think when both IDs are set, it might create a mapping, but I'm not sure if it's specifically for positions or just general assignments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanda
7 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. I think option A is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Augustine
8 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a strategy for this. Let me walk through the options step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbie
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording here. I'll have to re-read it a few times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marleen
8 months ago
This looks like a tricky question. I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
10 months ago
I think the answer is D) A relationship defined for a parent/child supervisor structure, because it sounds more logical to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joye
11 months ago
I feel like the developers who wrote this question were just trying to trip us up with those other options. D is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer could also be C) A mapping between an employee's identifier and the employee's assignment(s).
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
11 months ago
Haha, this question is like a game of 'Spot the Obvious'. Of course, the answer is D, it's the only one that mentions a parent-child relationship.
upvoted 0 times
Terina
10 months ago
Yeah, that makes sense. The other options don't mention anything about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
10 months ago
I think it's D, because it talks about a parent-child relationship.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dante
11 months ago
I was leaning towards B, but D makes more sense. The question is talking about a relationship between primary and secondary people, not just a lookup table.
upvoted 0 times
Dick
10 months ago
Let's go with D then. It makes sense in the context of the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Honey
10 months ago
I agree, D seems to be the most logical choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
10 months ago
I think D is the correct answer. It's about defining a parent/child relationship.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Royce
11 months ago
Hmm, I think the correct answer is D. The question is specifically asking about the Primary Person ID and Secondary Person ID Special Use Type properties, which are used to define a parent-child relationship, like a supervisor structure.
upvoted 0 times
Levi
10 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosamond
10 months ago
I believe it's actually A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
11 months ago
I think the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Helaine
11 months ago
I agree with Theron, because it makes sense to have a mapping between Primary and Secondary Persons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) A mapping is created between the Primary Person within a position and Secondary Person(s) within that position.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel