Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_THR86_2311 Topic 3 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_THR86_2311 exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 3
[All C_THR86_2311 Questions]

Your customer has two pay components, with IDs SALARY_US and SALARY_UK. that are used for employees' base salary in their respective countries They want to plan for all employees on a single worksheet using the employees' periodic salary NOT the annual value.What is the best way to accomplish this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Yvonne at Jul 15, 2024, 05:16 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_THR86_2311 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Kirk
8 months ago
I'm just happy they didn't ask about developing a custom 'pizza' statement. That would've really thrown me for a loop!
upvoted 0 times
Wynell
8 months ago
C) Field visibility is conditional on amount
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
8 months ago
B) Mix of data from compensation and variable pay
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
8 months ago
A) Different statements per employee group
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hobert
8 months ago
You know, if this was a question about building a custom pie chart, I'd be all over option D. But a custom statement? Gotta go with C on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Chanel
7 months ago
Definitely, conditional field visibility would make the statement more tailored to specific needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
7 months ago
I think option C is the most practical choice for meeting customer requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
8 months ago
Yeah, having field visibility conditional on amount would be really important for customization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
8 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice for developing a custom statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carin
9 months ago
Hold up, are we sure there's no 'All of the above' option? I feel like this question is trying to trick us!
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. Option B with the mix of data from compensation and variable pay seems more like a custom statement need to me.
upvoted 0 times
Rosamond
8 months ago
Yeah, that could definitely be a requirement for a custom statement. It's important to have that flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
8 months ago
I think option B makes sense, it's all about mixing data from compensation and variable pay.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willard
9 months ago
I see your point, but I still think A) Different statements per employee group is more specific.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
9 months ago
I think option C is the answer. Field visibility is definitely a custom statement requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Virgina
9 months ago
I see your point, but I still think option D is the best choice. A pie graph can be a useful way to show compensation element attribution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
9 months ago
I think option A could also be a requirement. Different statements per employee group might be needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nydia
9 months ago
I agree, option C makes sense. Field visibility is important for custom statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rodrigo
9 months ago
That could be true too, as combining data may require a custom statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
9 months ago
I believe the answer is B) Mix of data from compensation and variable pay.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
10 months ago
I agree with Rodrigo, because each employee group may have different needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
10 months ago
I think the answer is A) Different statements per employee group.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel