SAP Exam C_THR86_2311 Topic 1 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_THR86_2311 exam

Question #: 8
Topic #: 1

You have configured a worksheet for a client that uses the following formula in a custom column of type Money (curSalary ' lookupCbudgettable" customCountry 1))/100. The lookup table 'budget_table' is configured with one input and one output There are three rows in the table*USA =5*GBR = 3*' = 2 When the worksheet loads the column displays correctly but when a merit value is changed il switches to NfA for the employee What could be done to fix this behavior?

ASurround the curSalary with the toString function

BRemove the extra parentheses

CChange the column to be of the Amount type

DSurround the lookup function with the toNumber function.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Leatha at Mar 10, 2024, 01:14 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_THR86_2311 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Viki

1 years ago

Wait, you're telling me the system doesn't have a proration end date? What kind of sorcery is this? I'm just gonna pick the one that sounds the most magical, like option B. December 31st, the day the calendar fairies come and sprinkle proration dust on everything.

upvoted 0 times

Sherman

1 years ago

I'm going with option B too. December 31st does sound pretty magical, like the calendar fairies are at work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynda

1 years ago

I think I'll go with option C. The proration end date configured in the compensation template seems like the most logical choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eladia

1 years ago

I'm gonna have to go with option A. The end of the customer's fiscal year makes the most sense for date-based proration. Why would the system use a random date like December 31st?

upvoted 0 times

Cammy

1 years ago

I agree, using the end date of the customer's fiscal year for proration calculation seems logical.

upvoted 0 times

...

Phung

1 years ago

I think option A is the correct choice. It aligns with the customer's fiscal year.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nan

1 years ago

That could be a possibility. It's important to understand all the options when setting up the template for accurate proration calculations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Isabella

1 years ago

I'm not sure about that. I think it might default to December 31 of the current year if no proration end date is included.

upvoted 0 times

...

Raina

1 years ago

This is easy, it's clearly option D. The end date of the compensation worksheet is the only logical choice here. Anything else would be just silly.

upvoted 0 times

Lyndia

1 years ago

Definitely, option D is the most logical choice here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cheryl

1 years ago

I think so too. It wouldn't make sense to use the end date of the customer's fiscal year.

upvoted 0 times

...

Myong

1 years ago

I agree, option D makes the most sense. It's the end date of the compensation worksheet.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brunilda

1 years ago

Yes, that's a valid point. It probably depends on how the template is set up.

upvoted 0 times

...

Caitlin

1 years ago

But isn't it also possible for the system to use the proration end date configured in the compensation template?

upvoted 0 times

...

Cory

1 years ago

I think C is the correct answer. The proration end date should be configured in the compensation template, right? What kind of system doesn't have that option?

upvoted 0 times