Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_THR86_2311 Topic 1 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_THR86_2311 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 1
[All C_THR86_2311 Questions]

Your customer has part-time and full-time employees. You notice that for part-time employees, their compa-ratio in EC is different than in Compensation. What do you configure in the system to have it calculate the correct compa-ratio and take into account the FTE?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Cheryl at Jan 28, 2024, 04:04 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_THR86_2311 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Joanna
10 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I think B is the way to go. Gotta love those HR systems and their endless configuration options!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
10 months ago
Definitely B. The other options seem like they might work, but B is the most logical choice to handle the FTE discrepancy.
upvoted 0 times
Yuki
10 months ago
Yeah, that way the system can accurately calculate the compa-ratio based on the employees' full-time or part-time status.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
10 months ago
I agree, setting COMPENSATION_SAL_RATE_TYPE to FULL-TIME or PART-TIME makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Valentin
10 months ago
Haha, setting isActualSalarylmported to False or True? That's just asking for trouble. I'm going with B as well.
upvoted 0 times
Laquanda
10 months ago
B is definitely the way to go. Let's keep it simple and avoid any potential issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
10 months ago
Yeah, I don't want to mess with those XML attributes. B seems like the straightforward choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberta
10 months ago
I agree, setting isActualSalarylmported to False or True seems risky. I think B is the safer option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kate
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I feel like setting the SALARY_PRORATING in the UDE might be the way to go, since that seems more directly related to the part-time employees' compensation.
upvoted 0 times
Jamey
10 months ago
Let's go with setting SALARY_PRORATING in the UDE then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
10 months ago
I agree, that option seems to directly address the issue with part-time employees.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
10 months ago
I think setting SALARY_PRORATING in the UDE is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephaine
12 months ago
I think the answer is B. Setting COMPENSATION_SAL_RATE_TYPE in the UDF to FULL-TIME or PART-TIME seems like the most straightforward way to account for the FTE difference.
upvoted 0 times
Dallas
10 months ago
Yes, it seems like the most logical step to take in this situation
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
10 months ago
So, setting COMPENSATION_SAL_RATE_TYPE in the UDF is the way to go then
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
10 months ago
Definitely, it's all about ensuring the system has the right information to work with
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
10 months ago
It's a simple solution that would likely resolve the issue with compa-ratio discrepancies
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
11 months ago
I agree, it's important to specify whether the employee is full-time or part-time for accurate calculations
upvoted 0 times
...
Francis
11 months ago
That makes sense, it would ensure the system knows how to calculate the compa-ratio correctly
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucia
11 months ago
B) Set COMPENSATION_SAL_RATE_TYPE in the user data file (UDF) to FULL-TIME or PART-TIME
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel