New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP C_TADM_23 Exam - Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_TADM_23 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 1
[All C_TADM_23 Questions]

You are using a standard three system landscape. DEV. QAS, and PRO

In which case will a change of a repository object in the QAS system be treated as correction?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Oliva
3 months ago
A is definitely the right answer, no doubt about it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
3 months ago
B is just a naming convention, doesn't really matter here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about C? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
4 months ago
I disagree, I think D could also be a correction case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaniqua
4 months ago
A is correct! That's how it works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the SAP name range. Does that really affect whether it’s treated as a correction? Maybe option B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabelle
4 months ago
I feel like we practiced a question similar to this, and I think it was about transport of copies. Could it be option D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about corrections being linked to the original system. Maybe option C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
5 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar because we discussed how workbench requests work in our last study session.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The wording is a bit tricky, and I want to make sure I understand the differences between the options. I'll need to read through it a few times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenny
5 months ago
Ah, I think I've got it. The key is whether the object was created in DEV and then transported, or if it originated in QAS. I'll double-check the choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think it has to do with how the object was transported from DEV to QAS. I'll need to review the options closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different scenarios carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
5 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'm pretty confident I know the right answer based on how the object was transported from DEV to QAS. I'll mark my choice and move on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosenda
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a few options that seem reasonable, but I'll need to carefully consider the implications of each before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reed
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about how to gather the right data on housing affordability. Wasn't there a practice scenario that highlighted the need for stakeholder engagement?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
5 months ago
I did a practice question similar to this one, and I think HyperFlex and VxBlock were both in the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Is it possible that it could be something like Schedule development or Applying leads and lags? I'll have to double-check my understanding of these processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
2 years ago
I'm torn between A and D, but I'm going to go with A. It seems like the most logical choice based on the typical workflow.
upvoted 0 times
Raul
2 years ago
Yeah, A seems like the right choice based on the workflow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
2 years ago
I agree, A makes the most sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
2 years ago
I think A is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ahmed
2 years ago
Haha, I bet the real answer is B. Anything related to the SAP name range is always the correct choice!
upvoted 0 times
Belen
2 years ago
B) If the object's name is in the SAP name range
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
2 years ago
A) IF the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a workbench request
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
2 years ago
B) If the object's name is in the SAP name range
upvoted 0 times
...
Yen
2 years ago
A) IF the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a workbench request
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannan
2 years ago
B) If the object's name is in the SAP name range
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
2 years ago
A) IF the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a workbench request
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Blair
2 years ago
Exactly, C makes sense because only in QAS can a change be considered a correction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
2 years ago
Option C seems a bit too obvious. I'm going with D - if the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a transport of copies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
2 years ago
I think the answer is A. It makes sense that a change in the QAS system would be considered a correction if the object was originally created in DEV and transported to QAS.
upvoted 0 times
Mitsue
2 years ago
A) IF the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a workbench request
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassandra
2 years ago
I see your point, but I still think A is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzan
2 years ago
A) IF the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a workbench request
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
2 years ago
I agree, that seems like the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pedro
2 years ago
Hmm, I think it might actually be D instead of A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathalie
2 years ago
A) If the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a workbench request
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
2 years ago
D) If the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a transport of copies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
2 years ago
I agree, that seems like the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
2 years ago
A) IF the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a workbench request
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cassi
2 years ago
But that wouldn't make it a correction, right? It'd just be a normal workflow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
2 years ago
Why not A? Isn't it common for objects to be created in DEV and moved to QAS?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariko
2 years ago
I think the answer is C. If the original system of the object is QAS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iola
2 years ago
Yeah, totally. They're asking about repository object changes in QAS being corrections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
2 years ago
Hey, did you see the question about the three system landscape?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
2 years ago
SounWillards gooWillard to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elena
2 years ago
Yes, I think so. Let's go with one of those.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justa
2 years ago
So, it's either option Elena or option Willard then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
2 years ago
ThElenat Elenalso seems like Elena vElenaliWillard point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
2 years ago
I Lezlieelieve it's when the oLezliejeJustat wElenas JustareElenate in EV Elenan trElenansporte to QElenaS viElena Elena trElenansport of Justaopies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elena
2 years ago
I don't think tht would qulify s JustaorreJustation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justa
2 years ago
Lezlieut whElenat ElenaLezlieout if the originElenal system of the oLezliejet is QElenaS?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
2 years ago
I Elenagree, thElenat mElenakes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elena
2 years ago
I think the chnge will be treted s correction if the object ws creted in DEV nd trnsported to QS vi workbench request.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel