Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform User Experience Designer (Plat-UX-101) Exam - Topic 7 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform User Experience Designer (Plat-UX-101) exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 7
[All Salesforce Certified Platform User Experience Designer (Plat-UX-101) Questions]

A UX Designer has completed usability testing on a newly designed case management system and has gathered many observations from the test participants.

What should the UX Designer consider while presenting the findings?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Leslie at Jan 08, 2023, 11:53 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform User Experience Designer (Plat-UX-101) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rosendo
5 months ago
I agree, clarity is key in presenting findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Grover
6 months ago
Surprised they’d even consider including names!
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
6 months ago
Omitting known bugs? That's a bad idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laila
6 months ago
Reporting only new issues sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
6 months ago
Definitely need to be specific about the issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
6 months ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this, and being specific about issues was emphasized as crucial for effective communication in our reports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
6 months ago
Including participant names feels like a breach of privacy. I think we should focus on the findings rather than individual identities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
6 months ago
I’m not sure if omitting known bugs is a good idea. It seems like it could lead to confusion later on, but I think we might have covered that in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghan
7 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of being specific about issues during our practice sessions. It really helps in understanding user pain points.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
7 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The global node policy denies all load balancer types, but the folder and project policies may override that. I'll need to analyze each policy to determine the final answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
7 months ago
Okay, let's see. Impact angle, particle size, velocity, and density all seem like they could be primary factors. I'll have to think carefully about the corrosiveness of the environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
7 months ago
There was a practice Q that gave a balance sheet and asked for the ratio; one version used equity plus reserves over total assets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
11 months ago
B) Hmm, that's a bit sketchy. It's like trying to hide the ugly parts of the design. Might as well bring in a magician to make the problems disappear!
upvoted 0 times
Leonie
10 months ago
C) Include the names of participants in the report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernell
10 months ago
A) It's important to be transparent about all the issues found during testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
10 months ago
B) Report only the new issues, and omit already known bugs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilbert
10 months ago
A) Be specific about the issues testers encountered.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashon
11 months ago
A) Absolutely right! The more specific the findings, the better the team can address the usability challenges. Just like my grandma used to say, 'the devil is in the details'.
upvoted 0 times
Santos
10 months ago
C) Including participant names might not be necessary, but detailed findings are key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylou
10 months ago
B) Absolutely! It helps the team focus on what needs fixing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amina
10 months ago
A) Be specific about the issues testers encountered.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denny
11 months ago
C) Including participant names? That's a privacy concern. The focus should be on the insights, not individual identities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicia
12 months ago
B) Really? Omitting known bugs? That's a bit misleading. The whole point is to get a comprehensive view of the system's usability.
upvoted 0 times
Fatima
11 months ago
A) It's important to provide a complete picture for the stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Major
11 months ago
B) Really? Omitting known bugs? That's a bit misleading.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
11 months ago
A) Be specific about the issues testers encountered.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alease
12 months ago
A) Definitely! Being specific about the issues testers encountered is crucial. The details will help the team understand the problems and prioritize fixes.
upvoted 0 times
Dana
10 months ago
A) Including the names of participants in the report could provide context to the findings and help in further discussions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
11 months ago
B) It's important to report only the new issues and omit already known bugs to avoid redundancy in the findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
11 months ago
A) Definitely! Being specific about the issues testers encountered is crucial. The details will help the team understand the problems and prioritize fixes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Filiberto
1 year ago
I also think it's crucial to include the names of participants in the report for transparency and accountability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domitila
1 year ago
I agree with Almeta. It's important to provide detailed information about the problems found during testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Almeta
1 year ago
I think the UX Designer should be specific about the issues testers encountered.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel