Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Certified Platform User Experience Designer (Plat-UX-101) Exam - Topic 6 Question 75 Discussion

Posted by Lucia on Dec 06, 2024 at 09:41 PM

The Client Service team at Cloud Kicks is having issues when editing an order record. The validation rule returns a top-of-page error indicating two other fields must be provided to validate and save the order changes.

How should they efficiently find the correct fields?

Suggested Answer: A

When the Service team at Cloud Kicks faces difficulty due to an overload of list views, the most effective way to improve their experience is by decluttering the list views to make relevant ones easier to find. This can be achieved by:

Streamlining the List Views: Removing less frequently used or irrelevant list views from the public view helps in reducing clutter and focusing on the most pertinent information. This streamlining process makes navigation more intuitive and efficient for the service team members.

Options B (Updating Sharing Rules) and C (Allowing users to manage public list views) might help in managing access to records and customization, but they do not directly address the issue of having too many list views, which is the primary concern impacting the team's ability to find relevant information quickly.

Reference: Salesforce's documentation on managing list views provides strategies for organizing and customizing list views to improve usability and efficiency. This includes guidelines on creating, editing, and managing visibility of list views to ensure that users have access to the most relevant and useful information.


Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform User Experience Designer (Plat-UX-101) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
29 comments · newest first
JO
Johnna 11 months ago
Not sure if training alone will fix the issue.
EV
Eve 11 months ago
Adding field names to the error message could help a lot.
CA
Cassandra 11 months ago
Wait, removing the validation rule? That seems risky!
EL
Ellsworth 12 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense!
KR
Kris 12 months ago
Sounds like they need to check the validation rule settings.
JA
Jamey 12 months ago
Removing the validation rule entirely, as in option D, seems risky. Training is important, but we still need some form of validation, right?
CA
Carey 1 year ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question where we had to assign specific fields in validation rules. Option C might be the way to go, but I'm not completely confident.
GR
Gregoria 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think replacing the validation rule with help text, like in option B, could confuse users more than help them.
LA
Larae 1 year ago
I remember we discussed how validation rules should clearly indicate which fields are missing, so maybe option A is the best choice?
GR
Graciela 1 year ago
This one's a bit tricky. I'm not sure if adding the field names to the error message or replacing the validation rule entirely is the best approach. I'd probably start by trying to identify the specific fields that are causing the issue.
FA
Fallon 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got a plan. Based on the options, it looks like I should try to replace the top-of-page validation with individual field validations. That way, the users will get more specific feedback on what they need to fill out.
CA
Carlton 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a little confused here. The question doesn't give us much information about the specific validation rule or the order record. I'd need to do some more research to figure out the best approach.
KA
Kaitlyn 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward validation issue. I'd start by looking at the error message and trying to identify the specific fields that need to be provided.
GA
Gail 1 year ago
This question is making my head spin more than a fidget spinner. I just want to edit the order and get back to my coffee break, you know?
RA
Rashida 1 year ago
Removing the validation rule completely? That's like driving without a seatbelt. Might work, but I wouldn't recommend it.
LA
Launa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Rashida
C) Replace the top-of-page validation with two field validations, assigning the respective fields.
LA
Laurene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Rashida
B) Replace the validation rule with help text informing the business requirement.
JE
Jerilyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Rashida
A) Make sure the required field names are added to the top-of-page error message.
LO
Loren 1 year ago
Option C sounds like the way to go. Assign the fields directly in the validation - no need to guess which ones are required.
ST
Stefania 1 year ago
↳ replying to Loren
Agreed. It would save time and reduce errors in editing order records.
LI
Lisha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Loren
That's a good point. It would definitely make the process more efficient.
BU
Buck 1 year ago
↳ replying to Loren
Option C sounds like the way to go. Assign the fields directly in the validation - no need to guess which ones are required.
LA
Lauryn 2 years ago
Replacing the validation rule with help text? That's like putting a Band-Aid on a broken leg. Not very efficient if you ask me.
JE
Jerry 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lauryn
C) Replace the top-of-page validation with two field validations, assigning the respective fields.
VE
Verlene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lauryn
A) Make sure the required field names are added to the top-of-page error message.
VI
Viva 2 years ago
The top-of-page error message should definitely include the required field names. That's the most efficient way to find them.
VA
Valda 2 years ago
I see both points, but I think option B could also work. Providing help text can clarify the business requirement.
HU
Huey 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more efficient. Assigning the respective fields will ensure accuracy.
SH
Sheridan 2 years ago
I think option A is the best choice. It will make it clear which fields are missing.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel