Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam User Experience Designer Topic 2 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's User Experience Designer exam
Question #: 68
Topic #: 2
[All User Experience Designer Questions]

A UX Designer at Cloud Kicks is having difficulty getting its developers to see why the design changes would improve the user experience.

How should the designer help mitigate pushback from developers?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To optimize the relationship between two objects in Salesforce, such as Container and Container Bids, where there is a need for a tight relationship and cascading delete functionality, a Master-Detail relationship is most suitable. This type of relationship has the following characteristics:

Cascading Delete: When a record in the master (or parent) object is deleted, all related detail (or child) records are automatically deleted. This ensures data integrity and aligns with the requirement that Container Bids should be deleted when their associated Container is deleted.

Tight Coupling: A Master-Detail relationship creates a strong linkage between the two objects, where the detail (child) record's existence is dependent on the master (parent) record. This is appropriate for scenarios where the child record should not exist without its parent.

Options B (Hierarchical Lookup) and C (Many-to-one Lookup) do not provide the same level of dependency and cascading delete functionality inherent in a Master-Detail relationship.

Reference: Salesforce's official documentation provides extensive information on different types of relationships between objects, including Master-Detail relationships. The Salesforce Developer Documentation is a valuable resource for understanding how to set up and use these relationships to ensure data integrity and optimize application design.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Francine
2 months ago
Haha, I bet the developers are like, 'UX? What's that? We just write the code, man.' But seriously, communication is key here.
upvoted 0 times
Monte
13 days ago
A) Share research notes from previous projects with them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
17 days ago
Yeah, developers can sometimes be resistant to change.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
18 days ago
C) Work together on setting up UX Indicators.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
1 months ago
B) Get buy-in from the development lead first and let them persuade others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquanda
1 months ago
A) Share research notes from previous projects with them.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ivory
2 months ago
I like the idea of working together on UX indicators. That collaborative approach can really help foster a shared understanding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
2 months ago
Definitely agree that getting the development lead's buy-in first is key. If the team sees that the lead is on board, they'll be more likely to listen.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
2 months ago
Sharing the research notes is a great way to get the developers on board. Seeing the data will help them understand the reasoning behind the design changes.
upvoted 0 times
Nettie
1 months ago
B) I agree. Getting the development lead on board first can make a big difference in convincing the rest of the team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
1 months ago
A) That's a good point. Developers usually respond well to concrete data.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kyoko
2 months ago
Working together on setting up UX Indicators could be a good way to align everyone's goals and priorities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
2 months ago
I agree with Matilda. Getting buy-in from the development lead first could also be effective in convincing the rest of the team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matilda
3 months ago
I think sharing research notes would help developers understand the rationale behind the design changes.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel