New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Exam - Topic 6 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 6
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Questions]

Universal Containers implemented Sales Cloud and requested that only certain branch staff trained to sell high-risk products can create opportunities for high-risk products.

How should an architect allow only specific branch staff to sell high-risk products?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Hubert
3 months ago
A is just manual sharing, not scalable at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
3 months ago
Wait, can you really limit it just like that? Sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
4 months ago
Totally agree with B, it’s more efficient!
upvoted 0 times
...
Providencia
4 months ago
I think C is a bit too vague.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
4 months ago
Option B seems like the best choice for sharing rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vinnie
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the differences between manual sharing and sharing rules. I hope I can remember which one is correct during the exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Socorro
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question about OWD settings, and I feel like sharing rules are the way to go for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfrieda
5 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar, but I can't recall if manual sharing is more effective than a sharing rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
5 months ago
I remember we discussed sharing rules in class, but I'm not sure if they apply here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different policy options carefully to make sure I understand the nuances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
5 months ago
This sudo configuration seems straightforward, but I'll need to carefully read through the options to make sure I understand the permissions correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
5 months ago
Ugh, this is not my favorite type of question. All these option pricing models and assumptions - it's a lot to keep track of. But I'll give it my best shot. Maybe I'll start with the binomial model since that seems the most straightforward part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the contract scope options carefully to determine the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
10 months ago
Ooh, high-risk products, the financial thrill-seekers' delight! I'd say Option B is the way to go - sharing the price book via a rule just feels a bit more magical, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Teresita
9 months ago
Ilona: Definitely, it adds a touch of magic to the process!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilona
9 months ago
User 2: Yeah, sharing the price book through a rule seems like a more efficient way to manage permissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
9 months ago
User 1: I agree, Option B sounds like the best choice for controlling access to high-risk products.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jeffrey
10 months ago
Haha, high-risk products, huh? I hope the branch staff are ready to don their superhero capes! As for the answer, I think I'll go with B - can't beat a good old-fashioned sharing rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards C. Setting the OWD to View Only and then sharing the price book with the trained staff seems like a more straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
Florinda
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards C. Setting the OWD to View Only and then sharing the price book with the trained staff seems like a more straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
8 months ago
C) Set the price book organization-wide default (OWD) to View Only and share the price book (High Risk) with the trained staff.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lourdes
9 months ago
B) Set the price book OWD to View Only and share the (High Risk) price book with the trained staff via a sharing rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terina
10 months ago
A) Set the price book OWD to View Only and share the (High Risk) price book with the trained staff via manual sharing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fidelia
11 months ago
Ah, the classic high-risk product conundrum! I'd say option B is the way to go - sharing the price book via a sharing rule seems the most elegant and scalable solution.
upvoted 0 times
Erasmo
9 months ago
That's a good point. Option B does offer more specific sharing capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
9 months ago
True, option C could also work, but I think option B provides more control over who can access the price book.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaun
9 months ago
Yeah, setting the price book OWD to View Only and using a sharing rule for the (High Risk) price book makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
10 months ago
But wouldn't option C also work since it sets the price book OWD to View Only?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
10 months ago
I agree, option B does seem like the most efficient way to control access to high-risk products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
10 months ago
I agree, option B does seem like the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamera
11 months ago
I see both points, but I think option C is the most secure choice as it sets the price book OWD to View Only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zena
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more efficient as it uses a sharing rule to share the price book.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
11 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it allows manual sharing with trained staff.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel