Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Exam - Topic 3 Question 33 Discussion

An architect from a previous project implemented Platform Shield Encryption for a company. However, based on a recent audit, the company's Privacy Team identified three additional fields in their Account Records (Billing Street, Billing City and Phone) that needs to be secure and protected.How should an architect proceed with this new policy change?
C) Use Encryption Policy and contact Salesforce to update the existing records so that their field values are encrypted.
A) Use Classic Encryption to ensure all fields are protected and contact Salesforce for help with encryption verification.
B) Use Encryption Policy and wait for an email from Salesforce indicating the field values are encrypted.

Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Exam - Topic 3 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) exam
Question #: 33
Topic #: 3
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Questions]

An architect from a previous project implemented Platform Shield Encryption for a company. However, based on a recent audit, the company's Privacy Team identified three additional fields in their Account Records (Billing Street, Billing City and Phone) that needs to be secure and protected.

How should an architect proceed with this new policy change?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Herminia at Apr 14, 2024, 06:18 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Wynell
9 months ago
Why not just encrypt everything from the start? Seems odd!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ariel
10 months ago
Definitely go with option C, it covers all bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
10 months ago
Wait, can Salesforce really help with existing records?
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
10 months ago
I think using the Encryption Policy is better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tennie
10 months ago
Classic Encryption is a solid choice for this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
10 months ago
I vaguely recall that updating existing records is crucial for compliance, so maybe option C is the best approach? But I’m not entirely certain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether we should contact Salesforce for help or just wait for their email. I feel like proactive communication might be better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
11 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to decide between different encryption policies. I feel like using the Encryption Policy is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
11 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of using the right encryption method during our last study session, but I'm not sure if Classic Encryption is the best choice anymore.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomas
11 months ago
I think option C is the way to go. It's important to make sure all the required fields are properly encrypted, so contacting Salesforce to update the existing records is the responsible thing to do. It might take a bit more effort, but it's the right thing to ensure the company's data is secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hana
11 months ago
Option B seems like the easiest choice - just use Encryption Policy and wait for Salesforce to confirm the fields are encrypted. That way, I don't have to do much work myself. But I'm not sure if that's the best long-term solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think I'll go with option C - using Encryption Policy and contacting Salesforce to update the existing records. That way, I can ensure all the required fields are properly encrypted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vashti
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. Do I need to use Classic Encryption or Encryption Policy? I'm not sure which one is the right approach here. Maybe I should review the details again more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
11 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. The key seems to be understanding how the CIR values are allocated across the different queues. I'll need to consider the impact of each option on the overall distribution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
11 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not too familiar with Cisco Meraki's specific VPN terminology. I'll have to make an educated guess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
1 year ago
Ah, the joys of dealing with data privacy policies. Option C is the way to go, but I bet the Salesforce team is going to have a field day with this one.
upvoted 0 times
Boris
1 year ago
At least we know we're taking the necessary steps to protect sensitive data. It's all part of the job as an architect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Agustin
1 year ago
I can already imagine the back and forth with Salesforce to get everything sorted out. It's going to be a process for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
1 year ago
I agree, contacting Salesforce to update the existing records seems like the most efficient way to ensure compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yen
1 year ago
Option C is definitely the best choice here. It's important to make sure those fields are secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alfred
1 year ago
Classic Encryption? What is this, the 90s? Option C is definitely the way forward. Gotta keep that data secure, you know!
upvoted 0 times
Ezekiel
1 year ago
User 3: Gotta keep that data secure, you know!
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
1 year ago
User 2: Matt is right, Option C is definitely the way forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
1 year ago
User 1: Classic Encryption? What is this, the 90s?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kiley
1 year ago
Haha, I can just imagine the Salesforce support team's reaction to someone reaching out for 'encryption verification'. Option A sounds like a recipe for disaster!
upvoted 0 times
Sue
1 year ago
User 4: Definitely, let's make sure all the necessary fields are secure and protected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
1 year ago
User 3: Yeah, using Encryption Policy and reaching out to Salesforce for help sounds like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
1 year ago
User 2: Agreed, that seems like the most efficient way to ensure the new fields are encrypted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
1 year ago
User 1: I think we should go with option C and contact Salesforce to update the existing records.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yvonne
1 year ago
I think Option B is the way to go. The Encryption Policy should take care of encrypting the new fields, and Salesforce will let you know when it's done.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
1 year ago
Option C seems like the best approach here. Contacting Salesforce to update the existing records and ensure all the required fields are encrypted is the most comprehensive solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fairy
1 year ago
I'm not sure. Shouldn't we use Classic Encryption to ensure all fields are protected?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicky
1 year ago
I agree with Lashawnda. Contacting Salesforce to update existing records seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
1 year ago
I think we should go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel