Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect Topic 3 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Sharing and Visibility Architect exam
Question #: 33
Topic #: 3
[All Salesforce Certified Sharing and Visibility Architect Questions]

Universal Containers uses Person Accounts to represent retail customers and Business Accounts to represent commercial customers. The retail sales team should not have access to commercial customers but should have access to ALL retail customers.

With the organization-wide default on Account set to Private, how should the architect meet these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Elli
11 days ago
That's a fair concern, Justa. Maybe we could use a sharing rule that grants access based on the Retail Sales role instead of ownership?
upvoted 0 times
...
Justa
13 days ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about the owner-based sharing rule. Wouldn't that mean the retail sales reps would need to own all the Person Account records? That seems like a lot of extra work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
14 days ago
That's a good point, Carma. I think a combination of owner-based and criteria-based sharing rules might be the best approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
15 days ago
But what about the requirement that the retail sales team should not have access to commercial customers? Wouldn't a criteria-based sharing rule be better to differentiate between the two account types?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
17 days ago
Yeah, I agree with Ivette. The question specifically mentions that the retail sales team should have access to ALL retail customers, so an owner-based sharing rule seems more appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
18 days ago
This question seems straightforward, but I'm a bit unsure about the criteria-based sharing rule. Shouldn't we be using owner-based sharing instead?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel