Salesforce Exam Security and Privacy Accredited Professional Topic 1 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Security and Privacy Accredited Professional exam

Question #: 7
Topic #: 1

[All Security and Privacy Accredited Professional Questions]

A customer needs to track field history for more than 20 fields per object? How should the consultant advise them to proceed?

APurchase additional storage capacity to unlock additional field history tracking.

BPurchase the Field Audit Trail add-on feature.

CPurchase additional field history tracking capacity in blocks of 20 fields.

DEnable and save field history tracking settings on the 21st field to automatically add additional field history tracking capacity to the org.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Evangelina at Mar 02, 2023, 09:55 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Security and Privacy Accredited Professional Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Alesia

29 days ago

As a Salesforce consultant, I'd have to say that B is the way to go. Field Audit Trail is designed specifically for this use case, and it'll give the customer the tracking they need without any unnecessary complexity.

upvoted 0 times

Coleen

9 hours ago

Agreed. It's always best to go with a solution that is designed for the specific use case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jarvis

4 days ago

That's a good point. It's a straightforward solution that meets the customer's needs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karol

5 days ago

B) Purchase the Field Audit Trail add-on feature.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thersa

2 months ago

Option A, really? Throwing more storage at the problem? That's like trying to fix a leaky faucet by just turning up the water pressure. B is the sensible choice, no doubt about it.

upvoted 0 times

Tammi

20 days ago

Yeah, B is the best option for tracking field history for more than 20 fields per object.

upvoted 0 times

...

Meghan

1 months ago

I agree, A seems like a temporary fix. B is a long-term solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jordan

1 months ago

B is definitely the way to go. It's a more targeted solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mable

2 months ago

Haha, option D is like trying to hack the system. I can already see the poor consultant pulling their hair out trying to explain that one to the customer. No, B is the clear winner here - keeps things simple and secure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lanie

2 months ago

I'd steer clear of D - that sounds like a weird workaround that could end up causing more problems than it solves. C looks promising, but I'd want to know more about the pricing and implementation details before committing to that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ellsworth

2 months ago

I'm not sure, maybe purchasing additional field history tracking capacity in blocks of 20 fields could be a good option too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Darell

2 months ago

I agree with Linwood, it's a more cost-effective solution in the long run.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anissa

2 months ago

Option B seems like the way to go. Field Audit Trail is specifically designed for this use case, and it's a lot more straightforward than trying to juggle storage capacity or enabling settings on the 21st field.

upvoted 0 times