Haha, option D is like trying to hack the system. I can already see the poor consultant pulling their hair out trying to explain that one to the customer. No, B is the clear winner here - keeps things simple and secure.
I'd steer clear of D - that sounds like a weird workaround that could end up causing more problems than it solves. C looks promising, but I'd want to know more about the pricing and implementation details before committing to that.
Option B seems like the way to go. Field Audit Trail is specifically designed for this use case, and it's a lot more straightforward than trying to juggle storage capacity or enabling settings on the 21st field.
Mable
16 hours agoLanie
2 days agoEllsworth
13 days agoDarell
19 days agoAnissa
20 days agoCrista
4 days agoLinwood
21 days ago