Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Salesforce Marketing Associate Topic 1 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Marketing Associate exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 1
[All Salesforce Marketing Associate Questions]

Cloud Kicks (CK) has a very important new product launch coming up. CK has built an informative email to maximize awareness and interest. Management refused a giveaway as part of the campaign, but not deep discounts.

Which potential option violates CAN-SPAM specifications on subject lines?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Option C, 'You may have just won a $500 gift card!', potentially violates CAN-SPAM specifications on subject lines because it can be considered misleading or deceptive. CAN-SPAM regulations require that subject lines accurately reflect the content of the email. Misleading subject lines that imply the recipient has won a prize when this is not the case can lead to violations of these regulations, potentially resulting in penalties. It's crucial for marketing communications to be transparent and not mislead recipients about the nature of the email content.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Irving
12 months ago
Option A seems like the safest choice then. It simply promotes the product without making any false claims or false sense of urgency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
12 months ago
That's a good point, Rasheeda. CAN-SPAM prohibits false or misleading subject lines, so option B might not be compliant either.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
12 months ago
But isn't option B also a violation? It creates a sense of urgency that could be considered deceptive.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
12 months ago
Haha, giveaways and deep discounts? Sounds like CK is trying to pull a fast one on their customers. Option C is just asking for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irving
12 months ago
I agree with Alease. Option C may mislead recipients and is not allowed under CAN-SPAM regulations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlene
12 months ago
I think Option A is the safest bet. It's informative without being deceptive or trying to create a false sense of urgency.
upvoted 0 times
Domingo
11 months ago
I agree, Option A is the best way to go. It's important to stay compliant with CAN-SPAM regulations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
12 months ago
Option A is definitely the safest choice. It's straightforward and doesn't seem misleading.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alease
1 years ago
I think option C violates CAN-SPAM because it includes a false claim of winning a gift card.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
1 years ago
Option B seems a bit sketchy to me. Telling people to reply ASAP for the 'best deal' sounds like a tactic to pressure them.
upvoted 0 times
Paola
11 months ago
I agree, it's important to be careful with subject lines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laila
12 months ago
Yeah, it could come off as spammy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phung
12 months ago
Option B does seem a bit pushy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamey
12 months ago
I agree, it's better to avoid that kind of language in emails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
12 months ago
Yeah, it could come off as spammy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lazaro
12 months ago
Option B does seem a bit pushy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shaunna
1 years ago
Option C definitely violates the CAN-SPAM act. You can't just claim someone has won a prize without being truthful.
upvoted 0 times
Mable
12 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Bong
1 years ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
1 years ago
C) You may have just won a $500 gift card!
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
1 years ago
B) IMPORTANT: Please reply ASAP for the best deal!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
1 years ago
A) You don't want to miss our newest product
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lavonda
1 years ago
Option B seems fine too, urgency can be effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
1 years ago
I would go with option A, it's straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
1 years ago
Yeah, C is definitely not allowed. It's misleading.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
1 years ago
I think option C violates CAN-SPAM Act.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel