New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Loyalty Management Accredited Professional (AP-212) Exam - Topic 3 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Loyalty Management Accredited Professional (AP-212) exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 3
[All Loyalty Management Accredited Professional (AP-212) Questions]

A Consultant will need to create a new voucher definition for a new voucher, wherever the new voucher has the requirements.

A total of two vouchers will be issued to the member.

The first voucher has a face value of $100, and the second voucher has a face value of $200.

Both vouchers must be used within three months after the first voucher's disbursement date.

The first voucher will be issued to the members over a period of a month.

Which voucher definition settings will fulfill the new voucher's requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To fulfill the new voucher's requirements, the voucher definition settings should be: Type: Fixed Value, Expiration Type: Period, Expiration Period: 3, Expiration Period Unit: Month, Face Value: $300, Partial Redeemable: Checked. This configuration ensures that two vouchers with the specified face values can be issued within the defined period and used within three months after the first voucher's disbursement date. The 'Partial Redeemable' option allows the vouchers to be used partially, providing flexibility in how they are redeemed by the members.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Stanton
3 days ago
Wait, can we really combine the values like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
8 days ago
The total face value should be $300.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
13 days ago
Option D looks good to me. The expiration period and face value match the requirements, and the partial redeemable setting is not needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
18 days ago
Haha, this reminds me of the time I accidentally issued a $1,000 voucher instead of two $500 ones. Oops!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
24 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Shouldn't the face value be $100 + $200 = $300 instead of a single $300 voucher?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
29 days ago
I agree with John. Option C seems to be the correct answer based on the given requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
1 month ago
I believe the expiration period should definitely be three months, but I’m not clear if the face value should be combined or kept separate for each voucher.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
1 month ago
I’m a bit confused about the partial redeemable setting. I thought it was important for members to use the full value, but I can't recall if it should be checked or unchecked.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thea
1 month ago
I feel like there was a practice question similar to this one, and it emphasized that the total face value should match the individual vouchers. So, I think $300 might be incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
2 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. I think option C is the way to go - it covers all the requirements with the 90-day expiration period and the $300 total face value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
2 months ago
I'm not sure about the partial redemption requirement. Does that mean the member can use the voucher for less than the full face value, or does it mean they can use it multiple times up to the full face value? That's a bit unclear to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desirae
2 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The key requirements are: 1) two vouchers, 2) $100 and $200 face values, 3) 3-month expiration, and 4) partial redemption. I think I've got a good handle on this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
2 months ago
Option C looks good to me. The expiration period of 90 days covers the 3-month requirement, and the total face value of $300 matches the two vouchers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
3 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of setting the correct expiration period for vouchers. I think it should be three months, but I'm not sure about the face value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
3 months ago
I think option A is the best choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
3 months ago
D is my pick. It matches all the requirements perfectly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the requirements. Do we need to create a single voucher definition that covers both the $100 and $200 vouchers, or do we need to create two separate voucher definitions?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
3 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward voucher definition question. I think I can handle this one.
upvoted 0 times
Orville
2 months ago
I agree, it seems simple enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel