While designing an experiential Loyalty Program, what are the two recommended objects to be used as a best practice to track what type of activity the member has with the program?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium Loyalty Management Accredited Professional (AP-212) Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
14 comments · newest first
YU
Yuette
11 months ago
D is too vague, I’d stick with B for clarity.
EL
Ellsworth
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about B? Seems a bit off.
MA
Maia
12 months ago
C seems overly complicated for tracking.
YO
Youlanda
12 months ago
A sounds right too, but B has a nice ring to it.
GA
Gail
12 months ago
I think B is the best choice!
RE
Renato
1 year ago
I’m leaning towards option B, but I can't recall if we discussed the importance of the transaction journal specifically.
LO
Loise
1 year ago
I’m a bit confused about the difference between Journal Type and Transaction Journal Type.
JA
Jacqueline
1 year ago
I feel like "Loyalty Member Currency" was mentioned in a similar practice question we did last week.
AR
Arthur
1 year ago
I think I remember something about using a transaction journal, but I'm not sure if it's the right type.
LO
Lorrine
1 year ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. Shoreside is looking for accreditation specifically for their behavioral healthcare services, so I need to focus on the options that are designed for that.
KI
Kindra
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between Layer 2 and Layer 3 roaming. I'll need to review those concepts before answering.
GE
Gerardo
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward true/false question. I'll read the statement carefully and select the appropriate answer.
SA
Sage
1 year ago
I'm not completely sure, but I think the lack of trust from cloud providers can really complicate investigations.
GO
Goldie
1 year ago
I'm a little confused on this one. If the client is aware and preparing, doesn't that mean it's a known environment? But the tester only has public info, so maybe it's partially known? I'll have to re-read the question carefully and think it through.