Salesforce Exam Salesforce Communications Cloud Topic 2 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Communications Cloud exam

Question #: 30
Topic #: 2

[All Salesforce Communications Cloud Questions]

Universal Container had been using Communication cloud CPQ and order management for their B2B use cases. One of the critical requirement was to send a router code to their downstream system. Sending the router code depends on certain condition *if the customer is moving the internet services and is eligible for router * if the customer is moving the internet service and did not have router before * if customer is renewing the internet service and did not have a router before. Which three option should consultant recommend to meet the requirements above while optimizing order submission performance?

AImplement the router condition logic in the integration layer as callout task

BMap all relevant information to the Customer Facing Service (CFS)

CUse action type from fulfillment request lines in the callout condition task

DImplement the router condition logic within decomposition layer with more conditions.

EUse the Action type from Order items to the Decomposition Relationship Conditions.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Glory at Jan 10, 2025, 12:30 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Communications Cloud Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Isaiah

2 months ago

I'm leaning towards B, C, and E as well. Gotta love those Salesforce integration layers - where the magic happens! Or should I say, where the 'router condition logic' resides.

upvoted 0 times

Fannie

1 months ago

Definitely, Salesforce integration layers are where the magic happens!

upvoted 0 times

...

Isreal

1 months ago

I agree, C and E seem like they would also help optimize the order submission performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vinnie

1 months ago

B sounds like a good option to map all the relevant information.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elizabeth

2 months ago

Haha, I can just imagine the consultant trying to explain the 'router condition logic' to the cusElizabether. 'It's like a Choose Your Own Adventure book, but with routers!'

upvoted 0 times

...

Merilyn

2 months ago

I agree with Dick, B, C, and E are the way to go. The key is to keep the logic as close to the customer-facing service as possible to improve performance.

upvoted 0 times

Salome

1 months ago

Agreed, keeping the logic close to the customer-facing service is key for performance optimization.

upvoted 0 times

...

Galen

2 months ago

I think B, C, and E are the best options for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dick

2 months ago

B, C, and E seem like the best options to meet the requirements and optimize performance. The integration layer and decomposition layer approaches seem a bit heavy-handed for this use case.

upvoted 0 times

Kathrine

21 days ago

E) Use the Action type from Order items to the Decomposition Relationship Conditions

upvoted 0 times

...

Apolonia

1 months ago

C) Use action type from fulfillment request lines in the callout condition task

upvoted 0 times

...

Ciara

2 months ago

B) Map all relevant information to the Customer Facing Service (CFS)

upvoted 0 times

...

Devora

2 months ago

I'm not sure about option A), I think option C) Use action type from fulfillment request lines in the callout condition task could also be a good choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gladis

2 months ago

I agree with Jacqueline. Option A) would optimize order submission performance by handling the router code logic in the integration layer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacqueline

2 months ago

I think option A) Implement the router condition logic in the integration layer as callout task would be the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...