Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Salesforce Communications Cloud Topic 1 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Communications Cloud exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 1
[All Salesforce Communications Cloud Questions]

A company is selling voice products to business customers. The offer allows customers to select devices of various models. The product modeler intends to create a phone add-on product specification with voice offers with a cardinality that allows up to 700. Which of the three statement are valid regarding the product model in this scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Madalyn
12 months ago
I would go with E. It makes sense that this type of modeling is not supported in EPC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerry
1 years ago
I am torn between C and D. Hierarchical modeling seems logical, but decomposition failure worries me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rusty
1 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B. Processing inefficiencies can occur with large cardinalities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
1 years ago
I think the answer is A, because using OOTB features should guarantee smooth operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
1 years ago
Option C seems a bit too good to be true. Hierarchical modeling is great and all, but I'm not sure it 'natively supports' EPC in this scenario. Better play it safe with option B.
upvoted 0 times
Nathan
1 years ago
Yeah, I think option B is the way to go. It's better to avoid any potential processing inefficiencies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildred
1 years ago
I agree, option C does sound a bit too optimistic. Option B seems like a safer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Verda
1 years ago
Ha! Looks like the developers forgot to account for the 'Curse of the 700 Products'. Option E is clearly the way to go - flat modeling is the only way to avoid this kind of mess.
upvoted 0 times
Mammie
1 years ago
I agree, hierarchical modeling with large cardinalities can lead to problems. Option E seems like the most practical solution in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alana
1 years ago
Option E is definitely the way to go. Flat modeling is the best choice to avoid any issues with processing inefficiencies.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Corrie
1 years ago
I personally think option D is the most relevant, as decomposition may fail with a high number of products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
1 years ago
I disagree, I believe option A is correct as the OOTB feature of EPC ensures smooth MACD operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queenie
1 years ago
I'm gonna have to go with option D on this one. The product model may use OOTB features from EPC, but I wouldn't be surprised if the decomposition fails when processing the maximum number of products.
upvoted 0 times
Deeanna
1 years ago
Let's keep an eye on how the product model handles the maximum number of products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iola
1 years ago
Hierarchical modeling might be the way to go to avoid processing issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jestine
1 years ago
We need to ensure our product model is efficient and doesn't encounter any failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
1 years ago
Definitely, processing inefficiencies can be a real issue with large cardinalities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
1 years ago
I think we should be cautious with large cardinalities in our product model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Boris
1 years ago
Agreed, using OOTB features doesn't guarantee success with decomposition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
1 years ago
Option D seems like the most reasonable choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jerlene
1 years ago
Option B seems like the most reasonable choice here. Modeling children with large cardinalities can definitely lead to processing inefficiencies, especially for MACD operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
1 years ago
I think option B is valid because having a large cardinality can slow down processing.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel