Ah, the classic 'delete and leave a trail of chaos' option. Always a crowd-pleaser when you want to really impress the higher-ups with your problem-solving skills.
Option D - the 'delete and forget' approach. Because who needs accountability when you can just sweep it under the rug, right? Totally the way to go if you want to keep HR happy and your job secure!
Option D? Seriously? Leaving the records unchanged after deleting the user? That's just asking for trouble. Might as well throw caution to the wind and let the user run amok.
Option C is interesting, but changing the user's profile to read-only seems like a half-measure. If they need to be removed immediately, might as well go all the way and freeze their account.
I'm not sure about option B. Deactivating the user and deleting their records in the Direct Manager field could have unintended consequences. Might be better to go with a more conservative approach.
Option A seems like the safest bet. Freezing the user's account while removing them from the Direct Manager field ensures they can't do any further damage.
I disagree. I think deactivating the user and deleting any records where they are referenced in the Direct Manager field is the safest option to ensure no access remains.
Alva
1 months agoJosphine
1 months agoCandida
1 months agoJosphine
2 days agoLinn
22 days agoLilli
2 months agoLeanora
2 days agoRyan
6 days agoWilson
29 days agoJerilyn
2 months agoHelene
2 months agoColette
1 months agoJess
1 months agoNan
2 months agoDeeann
2 months agoAvery
2 months ago