Salesforce Certified Sales Cloud Consultant (Sales-Con-201) Exam - Topic 5 Question 111 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Sales Cloud Consultant (Sales-Con-201) exam

Question #: 111
Topic #: 5

[All Salesforce Certified Sales Cloud Consultant (Sales-Con-201) Questions]

Cloud Kicks (CK) has been losing market share to competitors over the past year. CK management is planning next year's budget and has allocated more money for in-person meetings with its existing partners because CK thinks it will reduce churn.

Which option should a consultant recommend that CK use to track the spending increase for onsite visits?

AReport on opportunities with and without onsite activities.

BReport on the activity type that corresponds to an onsite visit.

CReport on accounts with and without onsite activities.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

In the Discovery phase of a Sales Cloud implementation, it is essential to define the sales processes that will be supported in Salesforce. This step involves understanding the specific stages and steps within the organization's sales cycle and ensures that Salesforce will be configured to align with these processes. Defining sales processes is foundational for creating a solution that meets business needs and is aligned with user expectations, as it impacts subsequent configuration, training, and adoption efforts.

by Tien at Mar 07, 2025, 02:26 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Sales Cloud Consultant (Sales-Con-201) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Wynell

2 months ago

Not so sure about that, option C could show more impact.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mickie

3 months ago

Definitely agree, onsite visits need clear tracking!

upvoted 0 times

...

Nelida

3 months ago

Reporting on accounts sounds like a solid approach too!

upvoted 0 times

...

Shelba

3 months ago

Wait, can we really say onsite visits will reduce churn?

upvoted 0 times

...

Franklyn

3 months ago

I think option B makes the most sense for tracking.

upvoted 0 times

...

Celia

3 months ago

I feel like option A might be too broad; focusing on specific accounts could yield better insights, but I’m not entirely confident.

upvoted 0 times

...

Verona

4 months ago

I practiced a similar question where we had to analyze activity types, so option B seems relevant, but I wonder if it captures the full picture.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leatha

4 months ago

I think reporting on accounts with and without onsite activities could give a clearer picture of churn reduction, but I need to double-check the details.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roselle

4 months ago

I remember discussing how tracking opportunities could help us understand the impact of onsite activities, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kami

4 months ago

I'm feeling confident about this one. Option C is the way to go. Tracking the accounts with and without onsite activities will give CK the data they need to evaluate the effectiveness of their increased spending on in-person meetings.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emerson

4 months ago

Option B seems a bit too specific. I think the best approach would be to look at the accounts with and without onsite activities, as suggested in option C. That should give us a clear picture of the impact of the increased spending.

upvoted 0 times

...

Terrilyn

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm trying to decide between options A and C. I think I need to read the question more carefully to make sure I understand the key details.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tess

5 months ago

This seems pretty straightforward. I'd recommend going with option C to track the accounts with and without onsite activities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

9 months ago

Option C is the clear winner here. Tracking accounts is the best way to go, unless CK wants to start measuring the number of handshakes per meeting or something equally ridiculous.

upvoted 0 times

...

Domitila

9 months ago

Option C, for sure. Reporting on accounts with and without onsite activities is the only way to truly gauge the impact of those meetings. It's basic business analytics, folks!

upvoted 0 times

...

Weldon

9 months ago

Honestly, any of these options could work, but I think Option C is the most comprehensive. Gotta love those accountants and their keen eye for detail!

upvoted 0 times

Nida

8 months ago

That's true, but I think focusing on the accounts themselves with Option C will give a more direct impact on reducing churn.

upvoted 0 times

...

Art

8 months ago

But wouldn't it also be helpful to see the opportunities with and without onsite activities? Option A could provide valuable insights.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vanda

8 months ago

I agree, having that detailed breakdown will help CK make informed decisions on their spending.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delsie

8 months ago

Option C is definitely the way to go. It gives a clear picture of accounts with and without onsite activities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Detra

10 months ago

I'm with Arlette on this one. Option C is the most logical choice to measure the effectiveness of CK's in-person meetings.

upvoted 0 times

Brett

9 months ago

Reporting on accounts with and without onsite activities is crucial for CK to understand the ROI of their increased spending on in-person meetings.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorothy

9 months ago

I agree, tracking accounts with and without onsite activities will show CK where they are making the most impact.

upvoted 0 times

...

Olive

9 months ago

Option C is definitely the way to go. It will give CK a clear picture of how effective their in-person meetings are.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlette

10 months ago

Option C is the way to go! Tracking accounts with and without onsite activities will give CK a clear picture of how the spending increase is impacting their churn rate.

upvoted 0 times