MENU
Which two use cases will protect the integrity of order data with activation limitations?
Choose 2 answers
Suggested Answer: C, D
Get Premium Salesforce Certified Agentforce Sales Consultant (Sales-Con-201) Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
RA
Raymon
12 months ago
D is a no-go, multiple reductions just complicate things.
RI
Richelle
12 months ago
B seems off, removing products could mess things up.
BA
Barney
12 months ago
Wait, can you really add new products to active orders? Sounds risky!
PU
Pura
1 year ago
Agree, C makes sense for integrity!
TR
Tricia
1 year ago
I think C is definitely one of the answers.
JU
Julianna
1 year ago
I’m leaning towards C and D, but I’m not confident about D. I recall something about limiting the number of orders to maintain clarity.
LA
Lasandra
1 year ago
I feel like option B could also be a good choice since removing products from active orders might compromise the order's integrity.
AR
Arlen
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure about option A; it seems risky to add new products to active orders. I remember a similar question where we discussed limiting changes to orders.
CA
Catina
1 year ago
I think option C makes sense because it ensures that orders have products before activation, which protects data integrity.
FR
Freida
1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward question about assigning territories to opportunities. I think the key is understanding the requirement to allow the user to manually search for and assign territories.
MA
Maricela
1 year ago
I think this question is testing our understanding of flexible budgets. I'll need to carefully consider the key characteristics of a flexible budget to determine the correct answer.
IS
Isadora
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to carefully review the knowledge areas and think through which activities are specifically related to planning and monitoring.